Re: Security ERRATA Critical: glibc on SL6.x, SL7.x i386/x86_64

2015-01-28 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 21:16 +, Pat Riehecky wrote: > Synopsis: Critical: glibc security update > Advisory ID: SLSA-2015:0092-1 > Issue Date:2015-01-27 > CVE Numbers: CVE-2015-0235 > -- > > A heap-based buffer overflow was found in glibc's > __nss_hostname_digits_do

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Critical: glibc on SL6.x, SL7.x i386/x86_64

2015-01-28 Thread Pat Riehecky
Not sure how that happened Any way, they are correctly posted now (repodata still rebuilding) Pat On 01/28/2015 09:14 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 21:16 +, Pat Riehecky wrote: Synopsis: Critical: glibc security update Advisory ID: SLSA-2015:0092-1 Issue D

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Security ERRATA Critical: glibc on SL6.x, SL7.x i386/x86_64

2015-01-28 Thread Phil Wyett
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 09:26 -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote: > Not sure how that happened > > Any way, they are correctly posted now (repodata still rebuilding) > > Pat Hi, A clean update. Thanks. Regards Phil signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

static linked ISA executables

2015-01-28 Thread Yasha Karant
Suppose one has an ISA executable file (e.g., an application that is a native binary executable, not an interpreted executable) that works under a different Linux distribution -- for clarity, call that OTHER Linux. OTHER may use a different kernel and a different glibc than SL, and the executa

Re: Security ERRATA Important: kernel on SL6.x i386/srpm/x86_64

2015-01-28 Thread Phil Wyett
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 15:41 +, Pat Riehecky wrote: > Synopsis: Important: kernel security and bug fix update > Advisory ID: SLSA-2015:0087-1 > Issue Date:2015-01-27 > CVE Numbers: CVE-2014-7841 >CVE-2014-4656 > -- > > * A flaw was found in the w

Re: static linked ISA executables

2015-01-28 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 28 January 2015 at 10:20, Yasha Karant wrote: > Suppose one has an ISA executable file (e.g., an application that is a > native binary executable, not an interpreted executable) that works under a > different Linux distribution -- for clarity, call that OTHER Linux. OTHER > may use a differen

Re: static linked ISA executables

2015-01-28 Thread Yasha Karant
On 01/28/2015 11:22 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 28 January 2015 at 10:20, Yasha Karant > wrote: Suppose one has an ISA executable file (e.g., an application that is a native binary executable, not an interpreted executable) that works under a diffe