[Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-01 Thread anatoly techtonik
Hi, There is an interesting thread, which needs some consensus. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/ I am against shipping global scripts that are not generally useful to all scons users, but it seems that nobody agrees. -- anatoly t.

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-01 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi Anatoly, On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: Hi, There is an interesting thread, which needs some consensus. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/ "consensus" between whom? And what is your concrete idea about how this consensus

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-01 Thread William Blevins
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > Hi Anatoly, > > On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There is an interesting thread, which needs some >> consensus. >> >> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/302/change-the-cache-to-use-2-character/ >> >> > "

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-01 Thread Vasily
Maybe such scripts could be kept in a separate directory or even in a separate repository to not be mixed with core scons code? Thanks, Vasily 02 февр. 2016 г. 0:57 пользователь "William Blevins" написал: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> On 01.02.2

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-02 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi William, On 01.02.2016 22:57, William Blevins wrote: [...] I think that a script of this nature should be revision controlled with the software release that it is related to. I'm not sure when this script should be removed sadly. I wish I could recommend doing it in the commit immediatel

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:57 AM, William Blevins wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: >> >> Hi Anatoly, >> >> On 01.02.2016 20:14, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There is an interesting thread, which needs some >>> consensus. >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/scon

Re: [Scons-dev] Shipping one time migration scripts with SCons

2016-02-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > @Vasily: It's okay for the script to be clearly visible, that's the whole > point about it. Users that need it for their migration tasks should be able > to find it with the least amount of effort. They already have to do some > "silly" migrati