Cool, thanks!
Do you know anyone who could sponsor this and create a web-review against the
patch?
Regards,
Sergeyt Tsypanov
13.08.2020, 19:22, "Sean Mullan" :
> On 8/13/20 9:04 AM, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't have account in JBS, so I cannot file an issue.
>>
>> Previously
All good catches! I will update accordingly.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 8/13/2020 11:13 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On 8/11/20 9:44 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
ping ...
On 7/30/2020 11:26 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
May I get the following test code update reviewed?
On 8/11/20 9:44 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
ping ...
On 7/30/2020 11:26 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
May I get the following test code update reviewed?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8250839/webrev.00/
SSLEngineTemplate is a template used for SSLEngine testing, which
depends on binary key
On 8/13/20 1:21 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
---
old/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/DHPrivateKey.java
2020-07-25 23:46:21.233726447 +0530
+++
new/src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/DHPrivateKey.java
2020-07-25 23:46:20.721720857 +0530
@@ -96,8 +96,6 @@
On 8/13/20 9:04 AM, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
Hi,
I don't have account in JBS, so I cannot file an issue.
Previously when I submitted patches via core-libs-dev mailing list previleged
users
filed the issues and created web-reviews.
I think this should be a subtask of
On 8/13/20 10:13 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 8/13/20 11:05 AM, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi Vipin,
Thanks for providing this fix, I'm happy to sponsor your change. To
complete the review, we still need someone to green light the
remaining changes below. I'm looping in net-dev and security-dev to
On 8/13/20 11:05 AM, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi Vipin,
Thanks for providing this fix, I'm happy to sponsor your change. To
complete the review, we still need someone to green light the remaining
changes below. I'm looping in net-dev and security-dev to have a look.
Bug:
Hi Vipin, Julia,
On 13/08/2020 16:05, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi Vipin,
Thanks for providing this fix, I'm happy to sponsor your change. To
complete the review, we still need someone to green light the remaining
changes below. I'm looping in net-dev and security-dev to have a look.
Changes to
Hi Vipin,
Thanks for providing this fix, I'm happy to sponsor your change. To
complete the review, we still need someone to green light the remaining
changes below. I'm looping in net-dev and security-dev to have a look.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251542
Webrev:
Hi,
I don't have account in JBS, so I cannot file an issue.
Previously when I submitted patches via core-libs-dev mailing list previleged
users
filed the issues and created web-reviews.
I think this should be a subtask of
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6736490, there's
already one
On 8/13/20 7:04 AM, Сергей Цыпанов wrote:
Hello,
previously I've sent an email regarding removal of redundant assignments if
default values to volatile fields, see
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-June/022137.html
There was a concern whether it's completely safe to
Hello,
previously I've sent an email regarding removal of redundant assignments if
default values to volatile fields, see
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2020-June/022137.html
There was a concern whether it's completely safe to remove those assignments
from JMM point of
12 matches
Mail list logo
