Hi Martin,
This looks good to me. The adaption makes sense.
Best regards,
Goetz.
From: security-dev On Behalf Of Doerr,
Martin
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 17:03
To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; security-dev
Subject: [11u] RFR: 8266293: Key protection using PBEWithMD5AndDES fails with
Hi Martin,
Thanks for downporting this.
Nice documentation of the changes! Looks good.
Best regards,
Goetz.
From: Doerr, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:28 PM
To: security-dev ;
jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: Langer, Christoph ; Lindenmaier, Goetz
Subject: [11u] RFR
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for reviewing!
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 5:42 PM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; jdk-updates-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK Dev list
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR: 821301
Hi,
I would like to downport this for parity with 11.0.7-Oracle.
It does not apply clean because in 11 changes were applied in
a different order than in 14.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8213010-certmgr.exe_keys-jdk11/
In ECUtil.java I had to resolve the Copyright.
patching file src
Thanks!
I should have stated that I don't need a new webrev, thanks anyways.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2019 11:59
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; OpenJDK Dev list
> ; OpenJDK Network Dev list d
Hi Christoph,
it is a good idea to keep testing these two matters separately.
Could you please document in the new test that in OpenJDK
it is decided to keep this property empty?
Something like:
@comment In OpenJDK, this property is empty by default and on purpose. This
test assures the default
ecurity-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Sibabrata Sahoo
>
> Subject: Re: jdk11u and jdk/jdk : jtreg test error in
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/ActalisCA.ja
> va
>
> On 11/27/18 7:36 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> &
Thanks Erik!
Pushed.
Best regards,
Goetz
> -Original Message-
> From: serviceability-dev On
> Behalf Of Erik Gahlin
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:34 PM
> To: security-dev@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev (serviceability-
> d...@openjdk.java.net)
> Subject: Re: 8215534: [t
Thanks Sundar!
Best regards
Goetz
> -Original Message-
> From: Sundararajan Athijegannathan
>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:47 AM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev (serviceability-
> d...@openjdk.java.net)
&
Hi,
These tests lack @requires vm.hasJFR, thus they are failing on AIX.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8215334-JFR_requires/01/
Please review.
I will push this to jdk12 as it is a testbug if I miss the RDP deadline.
Best regards,
Goetz.
HI Rob,
thanks for the update! Seems it was accepted for 11.0.2 ...
So I don't need to take action.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McKenna
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 17:35
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: security-dev@openjdk.ja
repo prepared by Oracle
will not be released to the open.
These two pieces of information don't fit together in
my mind :)
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Freitag, 16. November 2018 15:07
> To: 'Xuelei Fan
Hi,
we have a user running into jdk-8209965.
The downport change has been opened in August, but
not yet been worked on.
Will this be downported to jdk11u? If this is not being worked
on by Oracle, I would request a downport. But I don't want
to interfere with your work.
https://bugs.openjdk.
well.
>
> If needed, we might use something similar to JDK-8207768 where a
> category has been added for enhanced exception messages to the
> java.security file .
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
> From: Baesken, Matthias
> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2018
Hi Rajan,
are you working on this issue? We have this test disabled, I would like to run
it again.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: security-dev On Behalf Of
> Rajan Halade
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2018 17:42
> To: Baesken, Matthias ; security-
> d...@openjdk.jav
Hi,
I scanned all the changes we did to exception messages in our
internal VM, see below. We print paths and sockets in a row of places,
but also other information. It's wide spread, while most is in
java.base.
We plan to contribute these messages in the near future. Thus
it'll be useful if t
Ah, no, that is just the field that is initialized with the
Result of gtk3_get_color_for_flags() why I need to initialize it there.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016 12:10
> To: 'Prasanta Sadhu
Hi Prasanta,
good point, I added that too.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanta Sadhukhan [mailto:prasanta.sadhuk...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016 06:05
> To: Phil Race ; Sergey Bylokhov
> ; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> ; Vince
ginal Message-
> From: Phil Race [mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 20:59
> To: Sergey Bylokhov ; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> ; Vincent Ryan
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.net; 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>; security-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
>
gt; From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 20:47
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.net; security-dev@openjdk.java.net; 2d-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; Vincent Ryan
> Subject: RE: RFR(M): 8170525: Fix minor issues in awt coding
>
> Hi Goetz,
>
Hi Vincent,
I fixed the typo and added a remark to the first line of the bug text.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Ryan [mailto:vincent.x.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:10
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: awt-...@o
regards,
Goetz.
(Am I correct that your openJdk name is Vinnie?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Ryan [mailto:vincent.x.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 14:53
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.net; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
>
Hi,
I'd like to propose a row of smaller fixes where code is noted down a bit
questionable.
SAP's quality process requires that we fix these in our internal delivery, and I
Would like to share my fixes with openJdk. Some of these fixes are of more
theoretical nature as how I understand the code
23 matches
Mail list logo
