d.
So, is this sufficinet support for publication? If not, how much more is
needed? And by when?
W
>>>
>>> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
>>> ________
>>> From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of
>>
g co-chair
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Christopher
Morrow [morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:16 PM
To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
Helo WG peoples,
The follow
idr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of Christopher
> Morrow [morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:16 PM
> To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
>
> Helo WG peoples,
> The
> I'll advocate for a "publish it now and fix it later if needed"
> strategy.
the hidden tao of the ietf
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
At 8:49 PM + 6/28/12, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
This last call has ended. There were only three comments during the wglc.
Two noted that the document was solid, but that it was premature to
advance the draft when the protocols spec was still undergoing
changes and might produce new required f
...@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
Helo WG peoples,
The following update posted today. Sean and Tom have come to agreement
on their differences, I believe this closes the last open items on
this document.
Let's start a WGLC for this, ending: 4/27/2012 or 27/4
On 5/3/12 10:14 AM, Chris Morrow wrote:
On 05/03/2012 03:57 AM, t.petch wrote:
A question arising from my ignorance.
How do values in the security arc get assigned? Not IANA since there are no
IANA considerations, but how then?
good question... the below are asn.1 things, quickly searching
I have read the -03 version of bgpsec profiles. I think the current
version of the document is solid. But I don't think the protocol spec is
quite stable enough to say "we aren't going to be making any changes to
the bgpsec protocol that will require a change to the profiles document"
... but I
On 05/03/2012 03:57 AM, t.petch wrote:
> A question arising from my ignorance.
>
> How do values in the security arc get assigned? Not IANA since there are no
> IANA considerations, but how then?
good question... the below are asn.1 things, quickly searching around
isn't helping me out much ei
A question arising from my ignorance.
How do values in the security arc get assigned? Not IANA since there are no
IANA considerations, but how then?
On the IANA profiles web page I can see
(1.3.6.1.5.5.4)
and
(1.3.6.1.5.5.8)
but no 1.3.6.1.5.5.7, just a reference to Russ.
Tom Petch
- Orig
While I think the document may be pretty solid currently, the meta-issue of
the tail wagging the dog exists.
I.e. There still exists the potential for additional requirements to
surface,
related to the design and implementation of the bgpsec protocol, which have
the potential to "inform" additiona
Helo WG peoples,
The following update posted today. Sean and Tom have come to agreement
on their differences, I believe this closes the last open items on
this document.
Let's start a WGLC for this, ending: 4/27/2012 or 27/4/2012
Thanks!
-Chris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, wrote:
>
> A Ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
