Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision

2017-07-14 Thread Dale R. Worley
Paul Kyzivat writes: >> Contact: "" >> >> Contact: "" >> > > What leads you to this conclusion? Parameter order is never relevant. Specifically, a little earlier in section 19.1.4 is: o The ordering of parameters and header fields is not significant in comparing SIP and SIPS

Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision

2017-07-14 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 7/14/17 3:53 AM, Rakesh wrote: Hi Expert, I am facing an issue on which the contact URI comparison has happened and it fails due to the TRC parameter not in order which I guess so far. Contact: "" Contact: "" I saw in RFC 3261 19.1.4 URI Comparison URI uri-parameter components are c

[Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision

2017-07-14 Thread Rakesh
Hi Expert, I am facing an issue on which the contact URI comparison has happened and it fails due to the TRC parameter not in order which I guess so far. Contact: "" Contact: "" I saw in RFC 3261 19.1.4 URI Comparison URI uri-parameter components are compared as follows: - Any uri-