Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>> Contact: ""
>> <sip:+12345@179.18.39.29:36948;transport=udp;Hpt=8ea2_16;ssn;srti=s1_2>
>> Contact: ""
>> <sip:+12345@179.18.39.29:36948;transport=udp;Hpt=8ea2_16;ssn;srti=s1_2;TRC=ffffffff-ffffffff>
>
> What leads you to this conclusion? Parameter order is never relevant.
Specifically, a little earlier in section 19.1.4 is:
o The ordering of parameters and header fields is not significant
in comparing SIP and SIPS URIs.
>> I am facing an issue on which the contact URI comparison has happened and
>> it fails due to the TRC parameter not in order which I guess so far.
By the rules of 3261, these two URIs are equivalent.
Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
