Hi Ivo,
On 10/10/17 5:26 PM, Ivo Vastert wrote:
Hi Paul,
What we try to do is the following scenario:
Inbound call from: #gateway1 ==> #SBC1 ==> SIP client (Gateway offers
G711alaw, G711ulaw and G729) SBC passes codecs as-is.
Sip client has codec preference (G722, G729, G711alaw, G711ulaw)
T
Ivo Vastert writes:
> What we try to do is the following scenario:
>
> Inbound call from: #gateway1 ==> #SBC1 ==> SIP client (Gateway offers
> G711alaw, G711ulaw and G729) SBC passes codecs as-is.
> Sip client has codec preference (G722, G729, G711alaw, G711ulaw)
> The SIP client accepts this call
Hi Paul,
What we try to do is the following scenario:
Inbound call from: #gateway1 ==> #SBC1 ==> SIP client (Gateway offers
G711alaw, G711ulaw and G729) SBC passes codecs as-is.
Sip client has codec preference (G722, G729, G711alaw, G711ulaw)
The SIP client accepts this call, (#Leg1, on G729)
Th
On 10/10/17 12:33 PM, Ivo Vastert wrote:
Hi,
I have a question regarding possible codec re-negotiation in a Referred-by
scenario.
We have the following situation:
A UA which has 2 legs open to a SBC / B2BUA.
1 Leg is on G729 and 1 Leg on G722.
The UA is sending a Referred by towards the SBC to
Hi,
I have a question regarding possible codec re-negotiation in a Referred-by
scenario.
We have the following situation:
A UA which has 2 legs open to a SBC / B2BUA.
1 Leg is on G729 and 1 Leg on G722.
The UA is sending a Referred by towards the SBC to bridge the 2 calls.
What should happen wit
