Hello,
I am trying out block joins for my index at the moment as I have many
documents that are mainly variations of the same search content. In my case
denormalization is not an option, so I am using nested documents.
The structure looks like this:
doc
content
doc
filter
boost
Hello All.
How do i add a new core in Solr ?
My solr directory is :
/usr/share/solr-4.6.1/example/solr
And it is having only one collection i.e. collection1
Now to add the new core I added a directory collection2 and in that I
created 2 more directory.
/conf /lib
Now my what should be the entry
Hi,
I am using SolrCloud for getting results grouped by a particular field.
Now, I also want to get min and max value for a particular field for each
group. For example, if I am grouping results by city, then I also want to
get the minimum and maximum price for each city.
Is this possible to do
Hi Varun,
I think you can use group.truncate=true with stats component
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
If true, facet counts are based on the most relevant document of each group
matching the query. Same applies for StatsComponent. Default is false. !
Solr3.4 Supported from
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for the information! But as per Solr documentation, group.truncate
is not supported in distributed searches and I am looking for a solution
that can work on SolrCloud.
--
Varun Gupta
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Varun,
I think you
On 5/1/2014 1:49 AM, Sohan Kalsariya wrote:
Hello All.
How do i add a new core in Solr ?
My solr directory is :
/usr/share/solr-4.6.1/example/solr
And it is having only one collection i.e. collection1
Now to add the new core I added a directory collection2 and in that I
created 2 more
Hello everyone,
I am new to SOLR and this is my first post in this list.
I have been working on this problem for a couple of days. I tried everything
which I found in google but it looks like I am missing something.
Here is my problem:
I have a field called: DBASE_LOCAT_NM_TEXT
It contains
Hello,
Score support is addressed at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5882.
Highlighting is another story. be aware of
http://heliosearch.org/expand-block-join/ it might somehow useful for your
problem.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, StrW_dev r.j.bamb...@structweb.nl wrote:
Hi Yetkin,
You are on the right track by examining analysis page. How is your query
analyzed using query analyzer?
According to what you pasted q=CRD should return your example document.
Did you change something in schema.xml and forget to re-start solr and
re-index?
By the way simple
Hello All,
I am having a query issue I cannot seem to find the correct answer for. I am
searching against a list of items and returning facets for that list of items.
I would like to group the result set on a field such as a “parentItemId”.
parentItemId maps to other documents within the same
my wiki username is KeithThoma
Please add me to the list so I will be able to make updates to the Solr
Wiki.
Keith Thoma
On 4/30/2014 5:53 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
Shawn - Yes we have some plans to move to SolrCloud, Our total index size
is 40GB with 11M of Docs, Available RAM 32GB, Allowed heap space for solr
is 14GB, the GC tuning parameters using in our server
is -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
I’ve added you Keith, go ahead :)
-Stefan
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Keith Thoma wrote:
my wiki username is KeithThoma
Please add me to the list so I will be able to make updates to the Solr
Wiki.
Keith Thoma
I saw an overseer queue clogged as well due to a bad message in the queue.
Unfortunately this went unnoticed for a while until there were 130K messages
in the overseer queue. Since it was a production system we were not able to
simply stop everything and delete all Zookeeper data, so we manually
What version are you running? This was fixed in a recent release. It can happen
if you hit add core with the defaults on the admin page in older versions.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrmiller
On May 1, 2014 at 11:19:54 AM, ryan.cooke (ryan.co...@gmail.com) wrote:
I saw an overseer queue
Hi Erick,
thank you for your response. You are right, I changed alphaOnlySort to keep
lettres and numbers and to remove some acticles (a, an, the).
This is the filetype definition :
fieldType name=alphaOnlySort class=solr.TextField
sortMissingLast=true omitNorms=true
analyzer
For those Tomcat fans out there, we've released HDS 4.8.0_01,
based on Solr 4.8.0 of course. HDS is pretty much just Apache Solr,
with the addition of a Tomcat based server.
Download: http://heliosearch.com/heliosearch-distribution-for-solr/
HDS details:
- includes a pre-configured (threads,
I have set q.op=AND in solrconfig.xml and use edismax. I see the match as I
would expect except when I explicitly try to add binary logic. When I type
termA OR term B
I am still getting the results of termA AND termB.
Am I being stupid or is this just not possible?
Thanks,
-Bob
Hi Bob,
Can you paste output of debugQuery=true?
On Thursday, May 1, 2014 8:00 PM, Bob Laferriere spongeb...@icloud.com wrote:
I have set q.op=AND in solrconfig.xml and use edismax. I see the match as I
would expect except when I explicitly try to add binary logic. When I type
termA OR
I'm working on upgrading our Solr 3 applications to Solr 4. The last piece
of the puzzle involves the change in how fuzzy matching works in the new
version. I'll have to rework how a key feature of our application is
implemented to get the same behavior with the new FuzzyQuery as I did in
the old
On 5/1/2014 10:59 AM, Bob Laferriere wrote:
I have set q.op=AND in solrconfig.xml and use edismax. I see the match as I
would expect except when I explicitly try to add binary logic. When I type
termA OR term B
I am still getting the results of termA AND termB.
Am I being stupid or is
When using query screen:
1. chocolate cake results in following:
str name=parsedquery_toString+(((Category2Name:chocol^40.0 |
ManfProdNum:chocolate | ProductNumber:chocolate | ProductName:chocol^100.0 |
Category3Name:chocol^80.0 | Category4Name:chocol^80.0 | Keywords:chocol^300.0 |
I get this warning when Solr (4.7.2) Starts:
WARN org.apache.solr.util.xslt.TransformerProvider â The
TransformerProvider's simplistic XSLT caching mechanism is not appropriate
for high load scenarios, unless a single XSLT transform is used and
xsltCacheLifetimeSeconds is set to a sufficiently
I found the following discussion very helpful from back in 2012.
http://markmail.org/thread/lkl7ffi77w7hpv6n
Probably the best description I've seen for how facets are actually calculated
in Solr Cloud. Thanks. I presume this is for the most part still accurate.
But, I have a slightly
I found the following discussion very helpful from back in 2012.
http://markmail.org/thread/lkl7ffi77w7hpv6n
Probably the best description I've seen for how facets are actually calculated
in Solr Cloud. Thanks. I presume this is for the most part still accurate.
But, I have a slightly
Hi guys,
What would you say it's the fastest way to import data in SolrCloud?
Our use case: each day do a single import of a big number of documents.
Should we use SolrJ/DataImportHandler/other? Or perhaps is there a bulk
import feature in SOLR? I came upon this promising link:
Hi Costi,
I'd recommend SolrJ, parallelize the inserts. Also, it helps to set the
commit intervals reasonable.
Just to get a better perspective
* Why do you want to do a full index everyday?
* How much of data are we talking about?
* What's your SolrCloud setup like?
* Do you already have some
Hi Shawn,
Please check that link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.method there is
something mentioned in facet.method wiki
*The default value is fc (except for BoolField which uses enum) since it
tends to use less memory and is faster then the enumeration method when a
Hi Chris,
Looking at source code reveals that warning message printed always. Independent
of xsltCacheLifetimeSeconds value.
/** singleton */
private TransformerProvider() {
// tell'em: currently, we only cache the last used XSLT transform, and
blindly recompile it
// once
On 5/1/2014 3:03 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
Please check that link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.method there is
something mentioned in facet.method wiki
*The default value is fc (except for BoolField which uses enum) since it
tends to use less memory and is faster then
Thanks for the reply, Anshum. Please see my answers to your questions below.
* Why do you want to do a full index everyday?
Not sure I understand what you mean by full index. Every day we want to
import additional documents to the existing ones. Of course, we want to
remove older ones as
Shamik:
I'm not sure what the cause of this is, but it definitely seems like a bug
to me. I've opened SOLR-6039 and noted a workarround for folks who don't
care about the new track debug info and just want the same debug info
that was available before 4.7...
https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the
subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which
My apologies!!
On May 1, 2014 6:56 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh
The message implies that there is a better way of having XSLT
transformations. Is that the case, or is there just this perpetual warning
for normal operations?
-- Chris
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Looking at source code reveals that
On 5/1/2014 7:30 PM, Christopher Gross wrote:
The message implies that there is a better way of having XSLT
transformations. Is that the case, or is there just this perpetual warning
for normal operations?
When I was using XSLT, I got a warning for every core, even though I had
a cached
I think the key message here is:
simplistic XSLT caching mechanism is not appropriate for high load scenarios.
As in, maybe this is not really a production-level component. One
exception is given and it is not just lifetime, it's also a
single-transform.
Are you satisfying both of those
37 matches
Mail list logo
