Using a library from blob-store without "add-runtimelib"

Hi! I'm wondering if there's any possibility to tell the current collection to use a library stored in the blobstore using the solrconfig.xml instead of having to do a /config request. Same way local filesystem libraries are added in solrconfig, it could exist for blobstore libraries. Since it's

Re: Index process migration from 3.6.x to 4.x

> On 12/30/2014 2:16 AM, Samuel García Martínez wrote: > > I'm studying the migration process from our current solr 3.6 multitenant > > cluster (single master, multiple slaves) setup to a solrcloud 4.10.3 but > I > > have a a question about the tlog. > > >

Index process migration from 3.6.x to 4.x

Hi folks! I'm studying the migration process from our current solr 3.6 multitenant cluster (single master, multiple slaves) setup to a solrcloud 4.10.3 but I have a a question about the tlog. First of all, I will try to give some context: - 1 single master and N slaves. - around 300 cores

Re: High memory usage on solr 3.6

s with the exact same size 32792 [default buffer size]): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4740964/solr_references.png Can you give any hint on how to read this kind of reference graph? Thanks! On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Samuel García Martínez < samuelgmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > T

Re: High memory usage on solr 3.6

ry consumption > hits 4G and you continue running, you're probably seeing uncollected > memory. > > Best > Erick > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Samuel García Martínez < > samuelgmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, we are facing a high memory

High memory usage on solr 3.6

Hi all, we are facing a high memory usage in our Solr 3.6 master (not in the slaves) even during "idle" (non indexing) periods. container: Tomcat 6.0.29 maxthreads: 1.5k (i think this setting is wrong, 300 would be enough) solr: solr 3.6.0 setup: multitenant environment with 120+ cores and near 5M

Re: Multivalued facet with 0 unexpected results

Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Samuel García Martínez < samuelgmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, we are getting some facet (faceting a multivalued field) values > with 0 results using *:* query. I think this is really strange, since we > are using MatchAllQuery there is no wa

Multivalued facet with 0 unexpected results

Hi all, we are getting some facet (faceting a multivalued field) values with 0 results using *:* query. I think this is really strange, since we are using MatchAllQuery there is no way we can get 0 results in any value. That 0 results values were present in the index before the reindex we made. We

Re: How to boost exact match?

whops! Jack got it faster :D Sorry for "double" posting. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > You may want to do a copyfield and have one field that is stemmed for > casual matches at a lower boost while one is unstemmed and boosted higher. > > You could also do a copyfield

Re: How to boost exact match?

First of all, if you stem on indexing and you don't on query time, your queries wont find anything valuable. This is an easy approach. If you want full term (no stemmed) matches were boosted you have to query like: ?q=data management&defType=edismax&qf=*name_without_stemming^200* name^100 text ui

Re: Boosting near terms

I just read the edismax pf functionality and it covers all my needs. Many thanks :) 2012/3/19 Samuel García Martínez > Hi all, i have a question about boosting a given doc based on query terms > proximity. > > *query*: dog food*doc1*: "my dog eat food"*doc2*: "i hav

Boosting near terms

Hi all, i have a question about boosting a given doc based on query terms proximity. *query*: dog food*doc1*: "my dog eat food"*doc2*: "i have purchased the dog food on amazon paying with paypal" Current scoring tf/idf algorithm scores higher doc1 because length normalization. Is there any metho

Re: Ask about the question of solr cache

Is it possible that your Solr client (or the way you communicate with it) is aware of HTTP caching? If you are using a navigator in order to confirm these updates and commits, try disabling HTTP caching. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Are you sure you commit after you'r

Re: Error in New Solr version

You are using the uncomitted FieldCollapse component for 1.4.x. Now, on 3.x field collapse component is not that anymore. You must remove it and configure the out-of-the-box one. On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Vadim Kisselmann < v.kisselm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > comment out the lines

Re: Faceting is not Using Field Value Cache . . ?

AFAIK, FieldValueCache is only used for faceting on tokenized fields. Maybe, are you getting confused with FieldCache ( http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/FieldCache.html)? This is used for common facets (using facet.method=fc and not tokenized fields). This makes

Re: Counting in facet results

Hi, i think what you are looking for is "*nested facets*" or * HierarchicalFaceting * * * Category A - Subcategory A1 Category A - Subcategory A1 Category B - Subcategory A1 Category B - Subcategory B2 Category A - Subcategory A2 Faceting by Catego