but I
> am still a bit hoping that there is a more sophisticated solution with Solr.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: Thursday 13 December 2012 02:30
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can a field with defined s
s.
>>>>
>>>> Apply synonyms at index time and you will have none of those problems.
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
>>>>
>>>> wunder
>&g
s at index time and you will have none of those problems.
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
>>>>
>>>> wunder
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:
;
> >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Swati Swoboda wrote:
> >>
> >>> Query-time analyzers are still applied, even if you include a string in
> >> quotes. Would you expect "foo" to not match "Foo" just because it's
> >> enclosed in quo
phrase needed to be given a much lower
> weighting in order to find what the user was "likely" looking for.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Walter Underwood
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 7:16 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
&g
r 12, 2012 7:16 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can a field with defined synonym be searched without the
synonym?
If you have tons of content, you can do selective reindexing. You only need
to reindex the docs containing the the new terms. If I add a synonym for
"babysitter&q
> For example,
>
> (tv^0.5 OR television^2.5 OR "boob tube"^0.0001)
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Steve Rowe
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:28 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can a f
television^2.5 OR "boob tube"^0.0001)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can a field with defined synonym be searched without the
synonym?
Hmm, I've gotten
lyzers are still applied, even if you include a string in
>>>> quotes. Would you expect "foo" to not match "Foo" just because it's
>>>> enclosed in quotes?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also look at this, someone who had similar requirements:
>
Swati Swoboda wrote:
>>>
>>>> Query-time analyzers are still applied, even if you include a string in
>>> quotes. Would you expect "foo" to not match "Foo" just because it's
>>> enclosed in quotes?
>>>>
>>>> Als
this, someone who had similar requirements:
>>>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonym-Filter-disable-at-query-time-td2919876.html
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: joe.cohe...@gmail.com [mailto:joe.cohe...@gmail.com]
>>
le-at-query-time-td2919876.html
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: joe.cohe...@gmail.com [mailto:joe.cohe...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:09 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Can a field with defin
milar requirements:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonym-Filter-disable-at-query-time-td2919876.html
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: joe.cohe...@gmail.com [mailto:joe.cohe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apac
ter-disable-at-query-time-td2919876.html
-Original Message-
From: joe.cohe...@gmail.com [mailto:joe.cohe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can a field with defined synonym be searched without the synonym?
I'm aplying only
You can only search against terms that are stored in your index. If you
have applied index time synonyms, you can't remove them at query time.
You can, however, use copyField to clone an incoming field to another
field that doesn't use synonyms, and search against that field instead.
Upayavira
O
15 matches
Mail list logo