: > Is there any thinking about when that might drop (beyond the quite
: > understandable "when it's done")? Or, perhaps more reasonably, when it
: > might freeze?
FWIW: I have no idea ... it's all a question of when someone "takes
charge" on the release process -- quite frankly, so much is in f
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Sixten Otto wrote:
> So features are being actively added to / code rearranged in
> trunk/4.0, with some of the work being back-ported to this branch to
> form a stable 3.1 release? Is that accurate?
>
> Is there any thinking about when that might drop (beyond the
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Some discussions/voting happened and the trunk is intended to be ...
> more like a normal trunk.
>
> If you need features not in an official release, and are looking for a
> codebase with updated features, I would recommend instead considering
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Sixten Otto wrote:
> - Plunge ahead with the trunk, and hope that things stabilize by a few
> months from now, when we'd be hoping to go live on one of our biggest
> client sites.
> - Go with the last 1.5 code, knowing that the features we want are in
> there, and
I've been investigating Solr on and off as a (or even the) search
solution for my employer's content management solution. One of the
biggest questions in my mind at this point is which version to go
with. In general, 1.4 would seem the obvious choice, as it's the only
released version on that list.
