Upon reviewing your account, we noticed that your website is not listed first
on Google, Yahoo, Bing or any other search engine.
This may be costing you sales and website traffic, so we wanted to bring this
to your attention.
Please give me a call at 1 (800) 455-8040 to discuss how we can get yo
Pour voir le message, veuillez utiliser un lecteur de mail compatible HTML
Lien miroir :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_m/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjY1JmM9NDgzNjEyJmQ9MjAxMi0wOC0wMiAwMDozMDowMSZlPTEmaD0xNzI2NCZmPTE3MjY1Jmc9MTcyNjU=
Lien de désinscription :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_unsub/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjY1JmM9NDgzNjEyJm
Pour voir le message, veuillez utiliser un lecteur de mail compatible HTML
Lien miroir :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_m/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjYxJmM9NDgzNjEyJmQ9MjAxMi0wOC0wMiAwMDozMDowMSZlPTEmaD0xNzI2MCZmPTE3MjYxJmc9MTcyNjE=
Lien de désinscription :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_unsub/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjYxJmM9NDgzNjEyJm
Pour voir le message, veuillez utiliser un lecteur de mail compatible HTML
Lien miroir :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_m/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjYyJmM9NDgzNjEyJmQ9MjAxMi0wOC0wMiAwMDoyMDowMSZlPTEmaD0xNzI2MSZmPTE3MjYyJmc9MTcyNjI=
Lien de désinscription :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_unsub/YT0xMyZiPTE3MjYyJmM9NDgzNjEyJm
On 01.08.2012 22:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>> could you have another look at these patches maybe? They aren't urgent,
>> I just want to avoid the get lost.
>
> Can you please resend them with me in the CCs? My process for handling
> pa
This patch adds DT bindings to the spi-gpio driver and some
documentation about how to use it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack
Cc: Mark Brown
Cc: Grant Likely
Cc: Linus Walleij
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-gpio.txt | 29 +++
drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c |
The spi-gpio driver currently assumes the chipselect gpio number is
stored in ->controller_data of the device's static board information.
In devicetree environments, this information is unavailable and has to
be derived from the DT node.
This patch moves the gpio storage to the controller's priva
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:45:19PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> could you have another look at these patches maybe? They aren't urgent,
> I just want to avoid the get lost.
Can you please resend them with me in the CCs? My process for handling
patches is very heavily based on my inbox.
-
Mark,
could you have another look at these patches maybe? They aren't urgent,
I just want to avoid the get lost.
Thanks for your time,
Daniel
On 25.07.2012 13:44, Daniel Mack wrote:
> The spi-gpio driver currently assumes the chipselect gpio number is
> stored in ->controller_data of the device
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:40:50PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> + /*
> + * Small blocks can be transfered via PIO.
> + * Measured by empiric means:
> + *
> + * dd if=/dev/mtdblock0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=1
> + *
> +
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:40:48PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This is slightly reworked version of the SPI driver.
> Support for DT has been added and it's been converted
> to queued API.
Looks reasonable overall.
> + bits_per_word = dev->bits_per_word;
> + if (t && t->bits_per_word)
>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:06:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> The kfree() is taken care of by the spi core (spi_master_release() function)
> that is called once the last reference to the underlying struct device has
> been released. So the driver need not call kfree.
>
> Also the put was misse
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:50:12PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:56:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Guess we are in violent agreement. The sequence would then either be
> > master = spi_alloc_device();
>
> The discussion is around spi_alloc_master rather than spi_al
The kfree() is taken care of by the spi core (spi_master_release() function)
that is called once the last reference to the underlying struct device has
been released. So the driver need not call kfree.
Also the put was missed in some of the error handling fix the same.
There by fixing the missing
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:38:07AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Shawn Guo writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:45:19AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > I must be missing something. Why do almost all spi drivers call it in
> > > > the
> > > > error path, even if there is no call to spi_master
Shawn Guo writes:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:45:19AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > I must be missing something. Why do almost all spi drivers call it in the
> > > error path, even if there is no call to spi_master_get ?
> >
> > To push the refcounting to 0, to deallocate the device, I'd say .
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:56:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Guess we are in violent agreement. The sequence would then either be
> master = spi_alloc_device();
The discussion is around spi_alloc_master rather than spi_alloc_device,
isn't it?
Regards,
Shawn
> ...
> spi_mast
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:40:53PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:45:19AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > I must be missing something. Why do almost all spi drivers call it in the
> > > error path, even if there is no call to spi_master_get ?
> >
> > To push the refcounting
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:45:19AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > I must be missing something. Why do almost all spi drivers call it in the
> > error path, even if there is no call to spi_master_get ?
>
> To push the refcounting to 0, to deallocate the device, I'd say ...
>
It's not going to work
19 matches
Mail list logo
