On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:56:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Guess we are in violent agreement. The sequence would then either be > master = spi_alloc_device();
The discussion is around spi_alloc_master rather than spi_alloc_device, isn't it? Regards, Shawn > ... > spi_master_put(master); > or > master = spi_alloc_device(); > ... > kfree(master); > > which makes sense to me. Question still is why most drivers neither call > kfree() > nor spi_master_put() in the remove function. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
