Re: [sqlalchemy] Performance questions on semi-large result sets

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: > If we OTOH use native_unicode=False and use the Unicode type for the > columns we care about, that seems a lot faster, e.g. changing the > mapping to: [...] > When we use the Unicode type and set

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Elixir question

On 02/03/2012 12:08 PM, lars van gemerden wrote: I should probably make the pair method: def pair(name1, name2): p1, p2 = Pairs(name1), Pairs(name2) p1.other = p2 p2.other = p1 On Feb 3, 11:57 am, lars van gemerdenl...@rational-it.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to sote pairs in a

Re: [sqlalchemy] Re: Order by in select doesn't seem to work

:53:15,786 INFO sqlalchemy.engine.base.Engine () Out[6]: [] I think this email thread is going to become the textbook example of why we took out default order by, the next time someone asks. -- Gaëtan de Menten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sqlalchemy] performance vs. psycopg2

but even then, your numbers seem strange (at least to me). -- Gaëtan de Menten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy

Re: [sqlalchemy] performance vs. psycopg2

or another -- the speed difference can vary quite a bit depending on that). You might get even worse results with a proper test though ;-). -- Gaëtan de Menten -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email