> But to ask otherwise, is there anybody else who has experienced
> similar performance problems when accessing lots of heavy eagerloaded
> sqlalchemy models wich are all already in the memory?
My app does quite a bit of heavy eagerloading in a lazy as-needed fashion,
and then clears the session u
On Apr 7, 4:48 pm, Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words - make sure the slowness isn't the client :)
I hope this post wasn't serious. Mozilla's CSS rendering engine,
doesn't write in our python profile on the server and no, we don't use
Mozilla for benchmarking (we are curr
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 05:26:31PM -0700, tux21b wrote:
> It's an Apache 2 with mod_wsgi. The server setup isn't configured for
> performance yet, and we can probably tune it a bit. But even when I
> test with the wsgi-ref server (without parallel requests) the
> application is slow. Beside sqlalc
It's an Apache 2 with mod_wsgi. The server setup isn't configured for
performance yet, and we can probably tune it a bit. But even when I
test with the wsgi-ref server (without parallel requests) the
application is slow. Beside sqlalchemy and memcached, we are using
django (there are still some de
Independently of database access, what webserver/module are you using
to host the application?
Graham
On Apr 7, 9:24 am, tux21b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I know that this problem isn't related directly to sqlalchemy, but
> maybe somebody can help me thought. We have develope
