>
> On 28 Aug 2010, at 4:24pm, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
>> I don't know whether my posts have a delay with delivery (replied
>> several
>> hours ago to the discussion you mentioned), but actually I tested 100
>> rows
>> before and after with a similar query (ORDER BY LIMIT) and it definitely
>> shows th
On 28 Aug 2010, at 4:24pm, Max Vlasov wrote:
> I don't know whether my posts have a delay with delivery (replied several
> hours ago to the discussion you mentioned), but actually I tested 100 rows
> before and after with a similar query (ORDER BY LIMIT) and it definitely
> shows that sqlite save
Simon,
I don't know whether my posts have a delay with delivery (replied several
hours ago to the discussion you mentioned), but actually I tested 100 rows
before and after with a similar query (ORDER BY LIMIT) and it definitely
shows that sqlite saves time and doesn't go further. Do you have reaso
Can someone check the source code for me ? Or perhaps this can be found from a
query plan or something.
A current discussion reminded me that something was never settled to my
satisfaction. If I use LIMIT in a SELECT, e.g.
SELECT name,address,(residents-1) FROM contacts WHERE postcode>'N" ORD
4 matches
Mail list logo