On 17 Jan 2018, at 8:40am, Christian Höhne wrote:
> Please unsubscribe me.
This list is run by computer. At the bottom of every post, including this one,
is a link which will allow you to unsubscribe yourself.
Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
Please unsubscribe me.
Christian Hoehne
Il 16 gen 2018 13:34, "Harald Klimach" ha scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> here is a weird behavior I observe with the following kind of setup:
>
> BEGIN TRANSACTION;
> CREATE TABLE simple("id" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT NOT NULL, "lft"
> INTEGER, "rgt" IN
> On 1/16/18, Don V Nielsen wrote:
> > Off topic question regarding fix: "0!=(wctrlFlags & WHERE_ONEPASS_MULTIROW)"
> >
> > Is there a performance bonus or compiler optimization if one compares a
> > target constant to a source condition versus comparing a target condition
> > to a source constan
On 1/16/18, 8:12 AM, "sqlite-users on behalf of Don V Nielsen"
wrote:
> Off topic question regarding fix: "0!=(wctrlFlags & WHERE_ONEPASS_MULTIROW)"
> Is there a performance bonus or compiler optimization if one compares a
> target constant to a source condition versus comparing a target condit
On 1/16/18, Don V Nielsen wrote:
> Off topic question regarding fix: "0!=(wctrlFlags & WHERE_ONEPASS_MULTIROW)"
>
> Is there a performance bonus or compiler optimization if one compares a
> target constant to a source condition versus comparing a target condition
> to a source constant, as in "(wc
Off topic question regarding fix: "0!=(wctrlFlags & WHERE_ONEPASS_MULTIROW)"
Is there a performance bonus or compiler optimization if one compares a
target constant to a source condition versus comparing a target condition
to a source constant, as in "(wctrlFlags & WHERE_ONEPASS_MULTIROW)!=0"?
Th
Wow,
> Bug fix is in. You can download the latest snapshot from
> https://sqlite.org/download.html.
>
> Alternatively, you can apply the patch at
> https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/feb2c2b6f66b0f45 to whatever prior
> version of SQLite that you happen to be using.
thanks a lot for this quick res
On 1/16/18, Harald Klimach wrote:
>
> here is a weird behavior I observe with the following kind of setup:
>
Bug fix is in. You can download the latest snapshot from
https://sqlite.org/download.html.
Alternatively, you can apply the patch at
https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/feb2c2b6f66b0f45 to w
Thanks for the bug report!
A ticket for this issue is here:
https://www.sqlite.org/src/tktview/47b2581aa9bfececa7d95b2ef2aa433418c7a583
I will post another message as soon as we have it fixed.
On 1/16/18, Harald Klimach wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> here is a weird behavior I observe with the followin
Hi there,
here is a weird behavior I observe with the following kind of setup:
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
CREATE TABLE simple("id" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT NOT NULL, "lft"
INTEGER, "rgt" INTEGER);
INSERT INTO simple VALUES(1,78,79);
CREATE INDEX "index_on_lft" ON "simple" ("lft");
CREATE INDEX
10 matches
Mail list logo