[squid-users] Squid 3.1 and strange "Bad header encountered" error

2010-06-08 Thread David B.
Hi Squid users, I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :( I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache). All is ok. Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch (Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.3 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu...). Thi

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.xx caching youtube ???

2010-06-02 Thread Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:39:48, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac a écrit : Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit : hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx? yes, all

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.xx caching youtube ???

2010-06-02 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:39:48, Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac a écrit : > Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > > Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit : > >> hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid > >> 3.1.xx? > > > > yes, alll it is possible > > but with 3.1 th

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.xx caching youtube ???

2010-06-02 Thread Leonardo Carneiro - Veltrac
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit : hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx? yes, alll it is possible but with 3.1 there is a limitation. i mean squid31 is unable to identify same video stream with differ

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1.xx caching youtube ???

2010-06-02 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Le mercredi 2 juin 2010 07:29:18, Ariel a écrit : > hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx? yes, alll it is possible but with 3.1 there is a limitation. i mean squid31 is unable to identify same video stream with different url

[squid-users] squid 3.1.xx caching youtube ???

2010-06-02 Thread Ariel
hello, list, it is possible cache contents and youtube with squid 3.1.xx?

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x uses considerably more memory than 2.7.x or 3.0.x

2010-06-02 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-06-02 klockan 08:37 -0300 skrev Murilo Moreira de Oliveira: > No, I'm not using delay pools. Follow my squid.conf file for more > detailed description of my scenario. What does the cacmegr Memory Utilization page say? Any obvious signs there? Regards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.x uses considerably more memory than 2.7.x or 3.0.x

2010-06-02 Thread Henrik Nordström
tis 2010-06-01 klockan 23:51 -0300 skrev Murilo Moreira de Oliveira: > Hi guys. I'm using squid 3.1.4 and since of first 3.1 stable release > I'm suffering from memory leak problems too. Are you using delay pools? Regards Henrik

[squid-users] Squid 3.1.x uses considerably more memory than 2.7.x or 3.0.x

2010-06-01 Thread Murilo Moreira de Oliveira
Hi guys. I'm using squid 3.1.4 and since of first 3.1 stable release I'm suffering from memory leak problems too. My production server is a CentOS 5.4 32 bits (kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5). It has 2GB of RAM (512MB reserved to squid cache_mem) and 6GB of disk space reserved to squid's disk cache. In

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-24 Thread alter...@gmail.com
> Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute? > The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec. I'm running squid3.0 on Dell R300 servers with 4x2.8GHz Intel Xeons and 12GB of ram. On production servers I'm getting max 1500hits/s. With 2500hits/s I have seen that some in access.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-24 Thread Henrik Nordström
mån 2010-05-24 klockan 00:47 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > I mean the "ExtremeCarpFrontend" configuration examples. > 990rps was simply the limit reached on the testing hardware. There may > be hardware able to go faster already. Or a reverse proxy with high memory hit ratio on slower hardware.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-23 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordström wrote: lör 2010-05-22 klockan 15:08 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute? The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec. 990 isn̈́'t the extreme.. but very high. I mean the "ExtremeCarpFrontend" configuration examples. 990rps wa

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-22 Thread Henrik Nordström
lör 2010-05-22 klockan 15:08 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Wow. Sure thats hits/sec and not hits/minute? > The 'extreme' setups of Squid-2.7 only reached 990req/sec. 990 isn̈́'t the extreme.. but very high. Regards Henrik

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
alter...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've run into problems after upgrading 3.0.STABLE19 (installed from packages) to squid 3.1 I'm running amd64 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, with squid as accelerated proxy. 3.0.STABLE19 runs almost flawlessly. I'm getting 'Select loop Error' every second: 2010/05/21 14:37:3

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 rejecting connections after few thousands requests

2010-05-21 Thread alter...@gmail.com
Hi, I've run into problems after upgrading 3.0.STABLE19 (installed from packages) to squid 3.1 I'm running amd64 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, with squid as accelerated proxy. 3.0.STABLE19 runs almost flawlessly. I'm getting 'Select loop Error' every second: 2010/05/21 14:37:34| Select loop Error. Retry

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 strange upload behavior

2010-05-12 Thread Henrik Nordström
ons 2010-05-12 klockan 17:20 +0200 skrev Daemen, Martin: > after upgrading squid from 2.7 to 3.1 there is an strange upload behavior. > Right now, the progress bar during the upload seem to show the upload in > realtime. So if we upload 15MB through our proxy to an webserver at the > internet,

[squid-users] squid 3.1 strange upload behavior

2010-05-12 Thread Daemen, Martin
Hello, after upgrading squid from 2.7 to 3.1 there is an strange upload behavior. Right now, the progress bar during the upload seem to show the upload in realtime. So if we upload 15MB through our proxy to an webserver at the internet, we using an 2M/bit SDSL line, the bar grows as far as th

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP bug on Solaris

2010-04-29 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi We have found a problem with Squid 3.1 on Solaris With ICAP enabled all pages over 49150 bytes fail to load. Squid returns an ICAP error page. Squid sends an incomplete RESPMOD to the ICAP server. It sends chunks totalling 49150 bytes and then fails to send a final 0 byte chunk. (256 byte p

Re: [squid-users] SQUID 3.1 + sslBump https interception and decryption

2010-04-21 Thread Franz Angeli
> From: Franz Angeli [mailto:franz.ang...@gmail.com] >> I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl >> support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate, >> obviously browser and >> applications warn about the certificate but all seems to work. >> >> Is there a

RE: [squid-users] SQUID 3.1 + sslBump https interception and decryption

2010-04-21 Thread Mellem, Dan
From: Franz Angeli [mailto:franz.ang...@gmail.com] > I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl > support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate, > obviously browser and > applications warn about the certificate but all seems to work. > > Is there a way to

[squid-users] SQUID 3.1 + sslBump https interception and decryption

2010-04-21 Thread Franz Angeli
Hi, I need for testing purpose (i have to test and debug several mobile phone java application some of that using https/ssl) to intercept and decrypt https traffic; I configured one debian box with squid 3.1 (compiling it with ssl support) enabling sslBump feature with a self signed certificate,

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:10:04 +0100, "Niall O'Cuilinn" wrote: > Hi > > I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of > the HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra line > return. You can see that after the last header there are three '\r\n' line >

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi I had a look at the null-body values. They correctly match the length of the HTTP 302 response headers block. The extra two bytes is an extra line return. You can see that after the last header there are three '\r\n' line returns. I tried removing one of them but the result was the same. I

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi, Just resending the correct request and response: ICAP Request from Squid: REQMOD icap://10.1.1.25:1344/reqmod ICAP/1.0\r\n Host: 10.1.1.25:1344\r\n Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:25:39 GMT\r\n Encapsulated: req-hdr=0, null-body=398\r\n Allow: 204\r\n \r\n GET http://c.proxy.com/www.test.com/ HTTP

RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-14 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi Christos Thanks for the reply. Sorry that was my mistake, I removed some sensitive info from the location header URL but forgot to modify the null-body value. It should have read "null-body=100" (I removed 60 chars/bytes). You might be right and it might still be out by two. I will have a l

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-13 Thread Christos Tsantilas
Niall O'Cuilinn wrote: Hi, I have recently moved from Squid 3.0 to Squid 3.1. I am trying to integrate it with an ICAP server. I am having a problem where Squid 3.1 is rejecting some responses from the ICAP server which Squid 3.0 accepted. The response in question is a REQMOD response where

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 ICAP Issue with REQMOD 302

2010-04-13 Thread Niall O'Cuilinn
Hi, I have recently moved from Squid 3.0 to Squid 3.1. I am trying to integrate it with an ICAP server. I am having a problem where Squid 3.1  is rejecting some responses from the ICAP server which Squid 3.0 accepted. The response in question is a REQMOD response where the ICAP server is retu

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 + bridge + ebtables ??-- linu x-nelfilter o linux-tproxy4 ?

2010-03-17 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:12:15 -0300, Ariel wrote: > hello list I'm compiling squid 3.1 and wanted to know which option > should I choose to set it as ebtables + bridge + squid3 > > if - enable-linux-netfilter or enable-linux-tproxy? > Thanks --enable-linux-netfilter Amos

[squid-users] squid 3.1 + bridge + ebtables ??-- linux-nelfilter o linux-tproxy4 ?

2010-03-17 Thread Ariel
hello list I'm compiling squid 3.1 and wanted to know which option should I choose to set it as ebtables + bridge + squid3 if - enable-linux-netfilter or enable-linux-tproxy? Thanks

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 + tproxy + iptables 1.4.3 -url filter not working

2010-03-08 Thread Amos Jeffries
Dong-Yuan Shih wrote: 2010/3/8 Henrik Nordstrom : mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih: when i start my squid proxy the traffic is via ppp0 to internet but url filter rule is notworking ! Is there anything in access.log? Regards Henrik there is nothing access.lo

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 + tproxy + iptables 1.4.3 -url filter not working

2010-03-08 Thread Dong-Yuan Shih
2010/3/8 Henrik Nordstrom : > mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih: >> >> when i start my squid proxy >> the traffic is via ppp0 to internet >> but  url filter rule is notworking ! > > Is there anything in access.log? > > Regards > Henrik > > there is nothing access.log c

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 + tproxy + iptables 1.4.3 -url filter not working

2010-03-08 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:56 +0800 skrev Dong-Yuan Shih: > > when i start my squid proxy > the traffic is via ppp0 to internet > but url filter rule is notworking ! Is there anything in access.log? Regards Henrik

[squid-users] squid 3.1 + tproxy + iptables 1.4.3 -url filter not working

2010-03-08 Thread Dong-Yuan Shih
 hi all i setup my squid proxy follow this url kernel version & iptables all match Minimum Requirements http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Feature:_TPROXY_version_4.1.2B-_Support some diffenernt ip route add default via isp'gateway dev ppp0 table 100 my squid.conf #Recommended mi

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 and error_directory

2010-02-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
Amos Jeffries wrote: Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error messages. Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings (leaving 'em commented o

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 and error_directory

2010-02-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error messages. Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings (leaving 'em commented out, or setting 'em to s

[squid-users] squid 3.1 and error_directory

2010-02-08 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. Recently I decided to look on 3.1 branch on my test proxy. Everything seems to work fine, but I'm stuck with the problem with the error messages. Whatever I do with the error_directory/error_default_language settings (leaving 'em commented out, or setting 'em to something) in my browser I

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-10 Thread Babu Chaliyath
Hey Thanx Henrik, And Amos, Yes Definitely I can test them for sure. I here to do any help I can offer Regards Babs On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Babu Chaliyath wrote: >>> >>> Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees... >>> >>> The client info table had

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-08 Thread Amos Jeffries
Babu Chaliyath wrote: Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees... The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1, cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2 ... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1 The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and cacheClientAd

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-08 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2009-11-03 klockan 17:25 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: > > MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when > > their data sources go away and new number appear as new info gets > > published, but existing numbering should not change... > > Converting IPv4 address fields t

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-08 Thread Babu Chaliyath
> > Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees... > > The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1, > cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2 >  ... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1 > > The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and cacheClientAddressType

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1. Hmm.. what kind of changes? MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers m

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-02 Thread Babu Chaliyath
> Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source code. > There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1. > > Amos > -- > Please be using >  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20 >  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14 > Hi, thanx for the reply Yes I am using t

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-02 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: > Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source > code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1. Hmm.. what kind of changes? MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
Babu Chaliyath wrote: Hi List, Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph. My System as follows OS Freebsd 7.2 Squid 3.1.0.14 Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1 mrtg 2.16.2 Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command #snmpwalk -m /usr/local/e

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 + mrtg

2009-11-02 Thread Babu Chaliyath
Hi List, Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph. My System as follows OS Freebsd 7.2 Squid 3.1.0.14 Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1 mrtg 2.16.2 Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command #snmpwalk -m /usr/local/etc/squid/mib.txt -v2c -C

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > > > so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops > > connections when it should not". > > A bit funny ;) > > I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between > the Squid in front of dansguardian. >

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
Silamael wrote: Amos Jeffries wrote: You have IPv6 disabled in your system somehow. Squid opens IPv4/IPv6 hybrid sockets to receive and send both v4 and v6 traffic in one socket for simplicity and ease of transition. If that fails like in your case it falls back to IPv4-only sockets. I recomme

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Amos Jeffries
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Matus UHLAR - fantomas : so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops connections when it should not". A bit funny ;) I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between the Squid in front of dansguardian. client -> squid_

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > so the problem was not "3.1 uses too many connections" but "2.7 drops > connections when it should not". > A bit funny ;) I made some more experiments and found out that the problem is between the Squid in front of dansguardian. client -> squid_in_front -> dansguardi

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > > > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > > > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > > > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-14 Thread Silamael
Amos Jeffries wrote: > You have IPv6 disabled in your system somehow. > > Squid opens IPv4/IPv6 hybrid sockets to receive and send both v4 and v6 > traffic in one socket for simplicity and ease of transition. If that fails > like in your case it falls back to IPv4-only sockets. > > I recommend re

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
mån 2009-10-12 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Amos Jeffries : > > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > > >dan

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Amos Jeffries : > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > >I'm running squid in this setup: > > > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm > >seeing

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: I'm running squid in this setup: client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > I'm running squid in this setup: > > client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs > > When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 > dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm > seeing a constant 252 dansguardian p

[squid-users] Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

2009-10-12 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
I'm running squid in this setup: client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100 dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes (the maximum). Is squid-3

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure : (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:05:52 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error: > > 2009/10/11 10:56:30| Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.0.14 for > i486-pc-linux-gnu... > 2009/10/11 10:56:30| Process ID 19416 > 2009/10/11 10:56:30| With 4096 file descriptors available > 2009

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > > With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error: > > My other squid instance reports: > > 2009/10/11 11:30:57| comm_udp_sendto: FD 6, (family=10) 127.0.0.1:53: (97) > Address family not supported by protocol > 2009/10/11 11:30:57| idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto

Re: [squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error: My other squid instance reports: 2009/10/11 11:30:57| comm_udp_sendto: FD 6, (family=10) 127.0.0.1:53: (97) Address family not supported by protocol 2009/10/11 11:30:57| idnsSendQuery: FD 6: sendto: (97) Address family not supported

[squid-users] Squid-3.1: comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family not supported by protocol

2009-10-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
With squid-3.1 I'm getting this error: 2009/10/11 10:56:30| Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.0.14 for i486-pc-linux-gnu... 2009/10/11 10:56:30| Process ID 19416 2009/10/11 10:56:30| With 4096 file descriptors available 2009/10/11 10:56:30| Initializing IP Cache... 2009/10/11 10:56:30| comm_open:

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1: ICAP and Round Robin for ICAP Services

2009-10-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
Silamael wrote: Silamael wrote: Hello together, Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next available ICAP service due to load balancing issues. As far as i read the configuration manual, there

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1: ICAP and Round Robin for ICAP Services

2009-10-01 Thread Silamael
Silamael wrote: > Hello together, > > Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests > sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next > available ICAP service due to load balancing issues. > As far as i read the configuration manual, there is no o

[squid-users] Squid 3.1: ICAP and Round Robin for ICAP Services

2009-09-29 Thread Silamael
Hello together, Is there any possiblity to realize a round robin scheduling for requests sent to ICAP services? Goal is to forward each HTTP request to the next available ICAP service due to load balancing issues. As far as i read the configuration manual, there is no option to to this. Can this b

RE: [squid-users] Squid 3.1, Tproxy 4.1, WCCP, cache_peer sibling

2009-09-27 Thread Michael Bowe
> -Original Message- > From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] > This is the first I've heard of the problem. Thank you for pointing it > out along with the fix. > http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/HEAD/changesets/squid-3- > 10004.patch Thanks Amos, I've patched our serve

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1, Tproxy 4.1, WCCP, cache_peer sibling

2009-09-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
Michael Bowe wrote: I have a site with several squid servers setup as shown here http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 All the Tproxy functionality is working fine. Now I would like to enable cache-peer sibling proxy-only to avoid duplication of objects between each server's hard drive.

[squid-users] Squid 3.1, Tproxy 4.1, WCCP, cache_peer sibling

2009-09-25 Thread Michael Bowe
I have a site with several squid servers setup as shown here http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 All the Tproxy functionality is working fine. Now I would like to enable cache-peer sibling proxy-only to avoid duplication of objects between each server's hard drive. The servers sit in a

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 ntlm_smb_lm_auth --require- membership-of

2009-09-08 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:37:55 +0200, "Bammer Sebastian" wrote: > Hello, > > I have a question regarding squid 3.1. > I'd like to authenticate my users based on their AD group membership. > In the previous squid version this was possible with ntlm_auth > --require-membership-of=DOMAIN\\Group > From

[squid-users] squid 3.1 ntlm_smb_lm_auth --require-membership-of

2009-09-08 Thread Bammer Sebastian
Hello, I have a question regarding squid 3.1. I'd like to authenticate my users based on their AD group membership. In the previous squid version this was possible with ntlm_auth --require-membership-of=DOMAIN\\Group >From what I understand ntlm_smb_lm_auth is the successor to ntlm_auth? And there

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 icap clamav

2009-08-18 Thread John Andrunas
I am having trouble getting squid 3.1 configured with icap and clamav. I have it working with squid 3.0 but using the information on http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/ICAP I just get ICAP communication failed, nothing is getting logged in the icap logs so I am fairly sure that it is a squid con

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1: How to setup a Squid SSL reverse proxy for a parent SSL Squid proxy?

2009-08-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2009-08-11 klockan 08:47 -0700 skrev chrischni: > am i getting this wrong, or does that mean, that we don´t need to specify a > sslcert in the cache_peer line? Only if you want Squid to authenticate to the webserver using a client side certificate. > should he connect to the sharepoint with

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1: How to setup a Squid SSL reverse proxy for a parent SSL Squid proxy?

2009-08-11 Thread chrischni
Henrik Nordstrom-5 wrote: > > tis 2009-08-11 klockan 02:38 -0700 skrev chrischni: >> this is our cache_peer config: >> >> cache_peer 10.xxx.xxx.xxx parent 443 0 ssl no-query originserver >> login=PASS >> front-end-https=on sslkey=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslkey.key >> sslcert=//usr/newrprgate

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1: How to setup a Squid SSL reverse proxy for a parent SSL Squid proxy?

2009-08-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2009-08-11 klockan 02:38 -0700 skrev chrischni: > this is our cache_peer config: > > cache_peer 10.xxx.xxx.xxx parent 443 0 ssl no-query originserver login=PASS > front-end-https=on sslkey=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslkey.key > sslcert=//usr/newrprgate/CertAuth/sslcert.cert name=*.*.com Proba

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1: How to setup a Squid SSL reverse proxy for a parent SSL Squid proxy?

2009-08-11 Thread chrischni
fulanpeng wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a Squid reverse proxy running with SSL support. People can > access it with https://domainA.com. No problem. > Now I want to set up another Squid proxy server to proxy it with SSL > support. > That means https://domainA --> https://domainB. > > My configu

[squid-users] squid 3.1: How to setup a Squid SSL reverse proxy for a parent SSL Squid proxy?

2009-08-10 Thread fulan Peng
Hi, I have a Squid reverse proxy running with SSL support. People can access it with https://domainA.com. No problem. Now I want to set up another Squid proxy server to proxy it with SSL support. That means https://domainA --> https://domainB. My configuration file is similar like this for the

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 Release Date

2009-06-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
Amos Jeffries wrote: Silamael wrote: Francois Cami wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael wrote: Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released? Thanks in advance! http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#head-eea0e990c0003af12917552175691a5120980cdd Thanks for th

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 Release Date

2009-03-03 Thread Silamael
Amos Jeffries wrote: > We don't exactly date things here. With everyone working on voluntary > time its unpredictable. Though there has been a fairly regular 4-week > cycle for new X.Y.0.z beta releases. > > For planning and upgrade testing, 3.1.0.6 is a fairly stable point to > begins with. > >

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 Release Date

2009-03-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
Silamael wrote: Francois Cami wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael wrote: Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released? Thanks in advance! http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#head-eea0e990c0003af12917552175691a5120980cdd Thanks for the reply but this doesn't

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 Release Date

2009-03-02 Thread Silamael
Francois Cami wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Silamael wrote: >> Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released? >> Thanks in advance! > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#head-eea0e990c0003af12917552175691a5120980cdd > Thanks for the reply but this doesn't answer

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 Release Date

2009-03-02 Thread Silamael
Hello there! Is there any date when Squid 3.1 will be official released? Thanks in advance! -- Matthias

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 is stable enough for production / testing?

2008-12-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
Any update on how this testing has gone? Henrik Nordstrom wrote: 3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta releases (3.1.0.X). Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can test

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 is stable enough for production / testing?

2008-11-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
> 3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta > releases (3.1.0.X). > > Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this > is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can test > this now while the release is actively being tested. > >

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.1 is stable enough for production / testing?

2008-11-10 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
3.1 is certainly ready for testing. That's why we started making beta releases (3.1.0.X). Please give it a try and report back your findings. I don't think this is a setup that is commonly tested so it's very good if you can test this now while the release is actively being tested. Regards Henrik

[squid-users] squid 3.1 is stable enough for production / testing?

2008-11-10 Thread John Mok
Hi, I would like to setup squid proxy server for NTLM proxying (i.e. connection pinning) + ICAP (clamav). I hope someone could advise if there is any catch I need to pay attention with. Thanks a lot. John Mok

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-02 Thread İsmail ÖZATAY
Henrik Nordstrom yazmış: On lör, 2008-11-01 at 14:05 +0200, İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: I'm suspecting it may be gcc-3.3 related. Is there a more recent gcc version you can upgrade to and try again? Amos Opps i am already using gcc version 3.3.5 . ;) . I have just checked it... Is

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-01 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On lör, 2008-11-01 at 14:05 +0200, İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: > > I'm suspecting it may be gcc-3.3 related. Is there a more recent gcc > > version you can upgrade to and try again? > > > > Amos > Opps i am already using gcc version 3.3.5 . ;) . I have just checked it... Is there any newer GCC version

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-01 Thread İsmail ÖZATAY
Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail Some details about t

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail Some details about the errors would be helpful. Others have manag

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-11-01 Thread İsmail ÖZATAY
Amos Jeffries yazmış: İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail Some details about the errors would be helpful. Others have managed to get it to work o

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-10-31 Thread Amos Jeffries
İsmail ÖZATAY wrote: Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail Some details about the errors would be helpful. Others have managed to get it to work on OpenBSD. Amos -- Ple

[squid-users] Squid 3.1

2008-10-31 Thread İsmail ÖZATAY
Hi there, I can not configure squid 3.1 beta on my openbsd 4.3 server. When try to configure a get lots of errors. Has anybody ever tried this ? Thanks ismail

<    1   2