Re: [SR-Users] udp vs. tcp receiver processes

2011-08-04 Thread Juha Heinanen
Henning Westerholt writes: > this is the result of the different server design for UDP and TCP. For > TCP > AFAIK one main dispatcher accepts all the connections and then > distribute them > to the workers. For UDP the workers listen directly on the (one) network > socket, so there is no dispa

Re: [SR-Users] Homer Project

2011-08-04 Thread Alexandr S. Dubovikov
8/4/2011 7:23 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla ?: Hi Alexandr, Hello Daniel, thanks for this project. We will review the patches to kamailio and get them in the repository. Collecting 5 000 000 SIP packets/hour is quite some traffic, I would say!!! If the average size of sip packet is lik

Re: [SR-Users] Homer Project

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Alexandr, thanks for this project. We will review the patches to kamailio and get them in the repository. Collecting 5 000 000 SIP packets/hour is quite some traffic, I would say!!! If the average size of sip packet is like 0.5 to 1KB, then the traffic stored per hour is like 2.5 to 5 GB.

[SR-Users] Homer Project

2011-08-04 Thread Alexandr Dubovikov
Hello sr-users, I would like to present a new project called "Homer". What is Homer ? Homer is a capture solution for SIP logging. How does it work? Homer has 4 components: 1. Capture Agent 2. Capture Node 4. Capture DB 3. Web GUI. The capture agent takes your local SIP traffic and sends it t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio on a server with different network cards

2011-08-04 Thread Rocío Ruz
And this one too : modparam("pcscf","gg_ip","192.168.106.162") Thank you. RR 2011/8/4 Rocío Ruz > Thank you! > > And isn't there an impact on the line > > modparam("pcscf","ipv4_for_signaling","192.168.106.162") > > las well?How do I add my second IP? > > Thank you. > > RR > > El 3 de agosto

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio on a server with different network cards

2011-08-04 Thread Rocío Ruz
Thank you! And isn't there an impact on the line modparam("pcscf","ipv4_for_signaling","192.168.106.162") las well?How do I add my second IP? Thank you. RR El 3 de agosto de 2011 00:23, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > Hello, > > > On 8/2/11 11:19 PM, Rocío Ruz wrote: > > Hello, > > My

Re: [SR-Users] 480 Temporarily Unavailable. in kamailio 3.1.4

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
That 480 reply is generated by FreeSWITCH. You should run it in debug mode to see the reason of why 480 was generated. Also, since the communication between Kamailio and fs is on loopback interface, be sure you capture the SIP traffic on it with 'ngrep -d any ...' or 'ngrep -d lo ...' Cheers

Re: [SR-Users] How to reset t_on_failure/branch?

2011-08-04 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011/8/4 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > To reset, just use the parameter "0" or "" for t_on_xyz(). Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://list

Re: [SR-Users] How to reset t_on_failure/branch?

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 8/4/11 2:59 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: Hi, I remember that in Kamailio 1.5.X t_on_branch and t_on_failure still remain after rouning failure_route[XX], and I "think" there was a way to reset them. In 3.X it seems that t_on_branch and t_on_failure must be set again in failure_route

[SR-Users] How to reset t_on_failure/branch?

2011-08-04 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
Hi, I remember that in Kamailio 1.5.X t_on_branch and t_on_failure still remain after rouning failure_route[XX], and I "think" there was a way to reset them. In 3.X it seems that t_on_branch and t_on_failure must be set again in failure_route to take effect in next t_relay() call, am I right? Tha

[SR-Users] 480 Temporarily Unavailable. in kamailio 3.1.4

2011-08-04 Thread hala alramli
i installed kamailio and freeswitch according to http://kb.asipto.com/freeswitch:kamailio-3.1.x-freeswitch-1.0.6d-sbc i installed also rtpproxy . i managed to create 101,102,103 and all of them registered , i am not able to make calls between them, 480 temporarily  unavailable always the erro

Re: [SR-Users] udp vs. tcp receiver processes

2011-08-04 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 04 August 2011, Juha Heinanen wrote: > i have 8 children specified in default file and in cfg file i have: > > listen=192.98.101.10:5060; > listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5070; > listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5070; > listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5070; > listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5080; > listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5080; > l

[SR-Users] udp vs. tcp receiver processes

2011-08-04 Thread Juha Heinanen
i have 8 children specified in default file and in cfg file i have: listen=192.98.101.10:5060; listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5070; listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5070; listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5070; listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5080; listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5080; listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:6060; that results in 8 tcp receiver processes

Re: [SR-Users] $du gets set automatically before branch_route

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I committed a patch to master branch in order to skip setting the dst_uri to next hop address for branch route, link to commit: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=fb4ecbf986f4af366e5be9cbad26ceba924c77fd It would be great if you can give it a try and let

Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Sebastian, thanks for reporting back the results. On a second thought I updated the patch a bit to use a local variable for backup in order to allow nested execution of event_route[tm:local-request] which can be triggered by sending local generated requests. The commit was: http://git.sip

Re: [SR-Users] ERROR : when create database in kamailio 3.1.0

2011-08-04 Thread hala alramli
Hello Daniel, Yes ,it  works now . Thanks. Hala From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla To: hala alramli ; SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011, 18:09:53 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ERROR : when c