On Tue Jun 30 16:46:04 2009, Eloi Bail wrote:
To authenticate to a XMPP server, I must implement encryption. I
wanted to
test without it, to have a XMPP client as light as possible...
I have to go strait to SASL with encryption so...
Oh...
Although the specification says that plaintext auth
Great idea !
I will figure this out. Thanks a lot :)
Eloi
2009/6/30 Jiří Zárevúcky
> 2009/6/30 Eloi Bail :
> > To authenticate to a XMPP server, I must implement encryption. I wanted
> to
> > test without it, to have a XMPP client as light as possible...
> > I have to go strait to SASL with enc
2009/6/30 Eloi Bail :
> To authenticate to a XMPP server, I must implement encryption. I wanted to
> test without it, to have a XMPP client as light as possible...
> I have to go strait to SASL with encryption so...
> Thanks for your reply !
> Eloi
>
Nope, you don't need to. You can connect withou
To authenticate to a XMPP server, I must implement encryption. I wanted to
test without it, to have a XMPP client as light as possible...
I have to go strait to SASL with encryption so...
Thanks for your reply !
Eloi
2009/6/30 Jiří Zárevúcky
> 2009/6/30 Eloi Bail :
> > Thanks for your reply...
2009/6/30 Eloi Bail :
> Thanks for your reply...
> As I understood, if I want to push my presence, I have to send a stanza for
> each JID because XMPP servers can not route my presence (because roster
> empty)... which is not very great :(
> So I guess, I have to use encryption SASL, to have a not
Thanks for your reply...
As I understood, if I want to push my presence, I have to send a stanza for
each JID because XMPP servers can not route my presence (because roster
empty)... which is not very great :(
So I guess, I have to use encryption SASL, to have a not random JID and so
push only one
2009/6/30 Dave Cridland :
> On Tue Jun 30 16:20:25 2009, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/30 Dave Cridland :
>> > On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
>> >> empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you jus
On Tue Jun 30 16:20:25 2009, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
2009/6/30 Dave Cridland :
> On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>
>> It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with
an
>> empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have
to send
>> it to a known a
2009/6/30 Dave Cridland :
> On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>
>> It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
>> empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have to send
>> it to a known address, or add people to your temporary roster first.
>
>
On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have to
send
it to a known address, or add people to your temporary roster first.
FWIW, although I agree that's what *
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Eloi Bail wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would like to know if XMPP standard allows to push presence in case of
> anonymous SASL ?
>
It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have to send
it t
On Tue Jun 30 15:01:48 2009, Eloi Bail wrote:
I would like to know if XMPP standard allows to push presence in
case of
anonymous SASL ?
That's certainly possible. In general, an anonymous user is
"authenticated", and can do anything that a non-anonymous account can.
Like any account, thou
Hi,
I would like to know if XMPP standard allows to push presence in case of
anonymous SASL ?
If it is, do you know if ejabberd handles it ?
BR,
Eloi
13 matches
Mail list logo