Should I migrate the Chat Marker XEP to a Message based solution and assume
the issues regarding the storage of the messages with no body will be
resolved in some way?
Regards
Spencer
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:05 PM, David Laban alsu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 18:16 +0100,
On 23 August 2012 00:04, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0297
(Stanza Forwarding).
I have incorporated the feedback received so far, and a revised
version can be found here:
Thanks for the feedback.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.imwrote:
On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
I have several questions:
Section 2.1: If a server supports bidirectional
On 16 April 2013 21:16, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0220
(Server Dialback).
Abstract: This specification defines the Server Dialback protocol, which is
used between XMPP servers to provide identity
Peter,
On 2013-06-05 04:34, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/28/13 2:30 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0301
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/13 4:00 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 23 August 2012 00:04, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0297 (Stanza Forwarding).
I have incorporated the feedback received
On 5 June 2013 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/5/13 4:00 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 23 August 2012 00:04, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org
wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
On 2013-05-28 22:30, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0301
(In-Band Real Time Text).
Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted in-band over
an XMPP session.
Real-time text is text transmitted instantly
XMPP Extensions Editor schreef op 28/05/2013 22:30:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0301
(In-Band Real Time Text).
Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted in-band over
an XMPP session.
Real-time text is text transmitted instantly
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Wild mwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 June 2013 16:24, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 6/5/13 4:00 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
http://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/xep-0297.html
I reviewed this version.
Overall I think this is good to go, but I'm
On 6/4/13 11:51 PM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
Good morning
I did not write the XEP, not really read it whole, but from common sense:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Section 2.1: If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server
streams, it should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
(because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
not perfect):
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0219.html
Before I post an updated version, does anyone have requests
I've been thinking I'd like to resurrect the Hop Check proposal
(because after further reflection I think it would be useful, even if
not perfect):
for debugging/support? +1
[...]
Before I post an updated version, does anyone have requests for data
they'd like to see included in the data
13 matches
Mail list logo
