Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

On 6/4/13 11:51 PM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: > Good morning > > I did not write the XEP, not really read it whole, but from common sense: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Section 2.1: "If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server >> streams, it

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

On 6/5/13 4:27 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > > > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? > > I hav

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

Thanks for the feedback. On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? > > I have several questions: > > Section 2.1: "If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server > st

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

Good morning I did not write the XEP, not really read it whole, but from common sense: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:41:34PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Section 2.1: "If a server supports bidirectional server-to-server > streams, it should inform the connecting entity when returning stream > f

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/20/13 5:43 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections). > > Abstract: This specification defines a protocol for using > server-to-serve

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

I'm good with that. On 23 Apr 2013 13:10, "Philipp Hancke" wrote: > Am 08.04.2013 18:45, schrieb Philipp Hancke: > >> Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Kim Alvefur: >> >>> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? >>> >>> The elevation of any method of domain spoofing to

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

Patch attached, thanks zash. hrmpf, wrong patch, even though git should handle that gracefully. This one is right. diff --git a/extensions/xep-0288.xml b/extensions/xep-0288.xml index b94baf1..6d3b2f6 100755 --- a/extensions/xep-0288.xml +++ b/extensions/xep-0288.xml @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ C:

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

Am 08.04.2013 18:45, schrieb Philipp Hancke: Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Kim Alvefur: 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? The elevation of any method of domain spoofing to also include possible interception of outgoing stanzas. Mistakes by, or compromise of a

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

Am 19.03.2013 02:49, schrieb Kim Alvefur: 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? The elevation of any method of domain spoofing to also include possible interception of outgoing stanzas. Mistakes by, or compromise of a CA, faulty certificate validation etc might ma

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

On 2013-02-21 01:43, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to > clarify an existing protocol? Yes. > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and > requirements? Yes. > 3. Do you plan to impleme

[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections)

This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0288 (Bidirectional Server-to-Server Connections). Abstract: This specification defines a protocol for using server-to-server connections in a bidirectional way such that stanzas are sent and received on the same TCP connection.