Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2020-08-22 Thread Kim Alvefur
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 04:05:22PM -, XEP Editor Pipeline wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0352. > > Title: Client State Indication > Abstract: > This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: https://x

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2020-08-10 Thread Georg Lukas
* XEP Editor Pipeline [2020-08-04 18:07]: > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing protocol? Yes. > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction > and requirements? Partially. The XEP omits explicit requireme

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2020-08-10 Thread Holger Weiß
* XEP Editor Pipeline [2020-08-04 16:05]: > Title: Client State Indication > Abstract: > This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html > > This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business o

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2020-08-04 Thread Ruslan N. Marchenko
Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2020, 16:05 + schrieb XEP Editor Pipeline: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0352. > > Title: Client State Indication > Abstract: > This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: https://

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-12-12 Thread Daniel Gultsch
On Dec 7, 2017 18:37, "Jonas Wielicki" wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352. Title: Client State Indication Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its active/inactive state. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html This

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-12-12 Thread Ruslan N. Marchenko
On 07.12.2017 18:35, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352. Title: Client State Indication Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its active/inactive state. URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-12-11 Thread Kevin Smith
On 7 Dec 2017, at 17:35, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote: > > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0352. > > Title: Client State Indication > Abstract: > This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: https://xmpp.

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-11-01 Thread Jonas Wielicki
On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 18:38:46 CET Jonas Wielicki wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on > XEP-0352. > > Abstract: > This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > This Last Call begins today and shall end at the clos

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-18 Thread Ruslan N. Marchenko
On 18.03.2017 11:16, Dave Cridland wrote: On 18 March 2017 at 09:53, Florian Schmaus wrote: On 18.03.2017 09:43, Dave Cridland wrote: On 17 Mar 2017 21:52, "Ruslan N. Marchenko" mailto:m...@ruff.mobi>> wrote: On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: It should be explicitly s

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-18 Thread Dave Cridland
On 18 March 2017 at 10:16, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 18 March 2017 at 09:53, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> On 18.03.2017 09:43, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> On 17 Mar 2017 21:52, "Ruslan N. Marchenko" >> > wrote: >>> On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: >>> It sh

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-18 Thread Dave Cridland
On 18 March 2017 at 09:53, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 18.03.2017 09:43, Dave Cridland wrote: >> On 17 Mar 2017 21:52, "Ruslan N. Marchenko" > > wrote: >> On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> It should be explicitly stated that the CSI state is *not* >>

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-18 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 18.03.2017 09:43, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 17 Mar 2017 21:52, "Ruslan N. Marchenko" > wrote: > On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: > It should be explicitly stated that the CSI state is *not* > (because it > can not) restored after a s

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-18 Thread Dave Cridland
On 17 Mar 2017 21:52, "Ruslan N. Marchenko" wrote: On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: > It should be explicitly stated that the CSI state is *not* (because it > can not) restored after a stream resumption. I've created a PR to > address this: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/402 > > Wh

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-17 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 17.03.2017 22:51, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote: > > On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> It should be explicitly stated that the CSI state is *not* (because it >> can not) restored after a stream resumption. I've created a PR to >> address this: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/402 > > P

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-17 Thread Ruslan N. Marchenko
On 11.02.2017 21:43, Florian Schmaus wrote: It should be explicitly stated that the CSI state is *not* (because it can not) restored after a stream resumption. I've created a PR to address this: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/402 Why *not* btw? Device may detect the connection is dropped (by

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-03-17 Thread Sam Whited
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:07 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). Since there is still open feedback and open changes on this XEP, I have extended the Last Call again. The LC will now end on 2017-

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-23 Thread Dave Cridland
On 8 February 2017 at 23:07, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to > clarify an existing protocol? Yes. A number of private extensions have been filling this gap. > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-23 Thread Jakob Schröter
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:07 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol? Yes. 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and requirements? Yes. 3. Do you plan

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-23 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 9 February 2017 at 00:07, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). > > Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/x

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-23 Thread Daniel Gultsch
2017-02-09 0:07 GMT+01:00 XMPP Extensions Editor : > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to > clarify an existing protocol? Yes > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and > requirements? Yes > 3. Do you plan to implement thi

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-22 Thread Sam Whited
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:07 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). > … > This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on > 2017-02-22. FYI: I have extended the LC for this spe

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-11 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 09.02.2017 00:07, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). > > Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-035

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2017-02-09 Thread Ruslan N. Marchenko
On 09.02.2017 00:07, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 (Client State Indication). Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its active/inactive state. URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html Th

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-23 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 23.09.2015 17:29, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 22 September 2015 at 21:53, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet > wrote: >> On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: >>> >>> On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 >>

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-23 Thread Matthew Wild
On 22 September 2015 at 21:53, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> >> On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >>> >>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 >>> (Client State Indication). >>> >>> Abstract: Thi

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-23 Thread Kevin Smith
On 22 Sep 2015, at 21:53, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > > On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 >>> (Client State Indication). >>> >>> Abstract: This docum

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-23 Thread Kurt Zeilenga
I support adding of the proposed text. — Kurt > On Sep 22, 2015, at 1:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet > wrote: > > On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 >>>

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-22 Thread
On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote: On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 (Client State Indication). Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its active/inactive state. URL: h

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-22 Thread Kurt Zeilenga
> On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:59 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). > > Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/ext

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

2015-09-22 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 > (Client State Indication). > > Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its > active/inactive state. > > URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-035