Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:47 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] Because in windows infrastructure the TZ

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:47 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > > Because in windows infrastru

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:38 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] I have updated the windows build infrastructure

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:38 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > > I have updated the windows bui

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] time_put like a bug in our infrastructure (I assume the example

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 7:41 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > >> a detectable requirement. Violations of the requirem

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 5:58 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > Farid Zaripov wrote: > >> -Original Message- &

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: [...] time_get looks like a bug (or lack of functionality) in our library time_get::date_order() returns time_get::do_date_order() which always returns dateorder () == no_order (loc/_time_get.h; line 137). Right. We ran out of time when implementing the facet. The stand

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 6:20 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > Farid Zaripov wrote: > >> -Original Message- &

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > [...] > For the rest, we should open issues in Jira so we

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] > time_put like a bug in our infrastructure (I assume the &

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Farid Zaripov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 7:30 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] > > I have updated the windows build infrastructure to set TZ &

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] time_get looks like a bug (or lack of functionality) in our

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] limits.cpp should produce the qnan for Quiet NAN and snan for

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] > time_get looks like a bug (or lack of functionali

RE: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC] [...] > limits.cpp should produce the qnan for Quiet NAN and sn

Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]

Farid Zaripov wrote: The list of the fails and reasons here: http://people.apache.org/~faridz/examples.html Thanks! I think that OUTPUT status is not a fail (and examples with that status are not counted as failed in unix-like platforms, but they are counted as failed on Windows platfor