RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

I ran the tests today on 33 and 41 with a new checkout and everything worked. Strange. I'll do it it again tomorrow to double check that I'm not crazy. (I'm on 1.4.2_01, W2K, Cactus 13-1.4.1, TC3.3a, TC4.1.27) Steve > -Original Message- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

This has been the source of many nights of frustration for me. The problem appears to be with Cactus. Here's what I'm doing: Windows XP Pro JDK 1.4.1_02 Cactus 13-1.4.1 and a brand spanking new cvs checkout As I am typing this, I am remote debugging Jboss/Tomcat and with a breakpoint

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Reviving PageController (ViewController?) discussion?

Joe Germuska wrote: See Ted's recent post copied in below... I'm definitely going to look at Chain before I invest a lot of energy in a PageController that works as earlier discussions have gone. So, just to report back. I tried using view Command in place of view action. It worked fairly well

Re: [chain] conditionals again

Greg Reddin wrote: If this is the case, how are we any better off with this model than we were with a monolithic request processor? Why should the commands have so much inter-dependence now that they are separate objects? Are we better off with them as inter-dependent separate objects than we

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23465] - "indexed" form data cannot be parsed by a struts DynaActionForm bean

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [chain] conditionals again

Greg Reddin wrote: I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already, but there's something I still don't understand... I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed rather than executing a "sub-chain" based on some condition. I can see the corre

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24021] New: - parsing exception fails to report which file being parsed....

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[chain] conditionals again

I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already, but there's something I still don't understand... I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed rather than executing a "sub-chain" based on some condition. I can see the correlation of the sub-ch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24000] New: - Cannot find bean under name org.apache.struts.taglib.html.BEAN (forgot to put the "name" in a multibox)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23972] - illegal character with struts-validator.war

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23972] - illegal character with struts-validator.war

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu