Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, David Van Assche wrote: > Hi folks, >    We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week Wednesday > 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm MST, and > 12 pm PST, most of Europe that will be 9 pm, 8 pm for the UK) > > So far we

[Sugar-devel] Can't compile mozilla on sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-05 Thread Bastien
Still failing to compile sugar-jhbuild: , | ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a: member ../../staticlib/libxpcom_core.a(nsDeque.o) in archive is not an object | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[3]: *** [libxul.so] Erreur 1 ` I'm running GNU/Linux version 2.6.26-2-686 (Debian 2.6.26

Re: [Sugar-devel] [math4] Activity Awards, Activity Alerts, Frame Alerts

2009-06-05 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Frederick, On 6 Jun 2009, at 00:30, Frederick Grose wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Gary C Martin > wrote: > ... > > FWIW, David Van Assche raised some interesting Activity ideas at > SugarCamp Paris and I'm interested/active in getting us to at lease > 'demo' state in the Sugar 0.

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Gary C Martin
On 5 Jun 2009, at 21:42, James Simmons wrote: > Gary, > > Thanks for doing this. I wish I could say it cleared things up but > I feel more confused than before. You say these are both XO's with > different versions of Sugar. I thought that the font behavior on > the XO was consistent, no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Gary C Martin
On 5 Jun 2009, at 21:19, James Simmons wrote: > David, > > Four of the Activities you will be testing use pretty much the same > code > for collaboration: > > sugar-read > sugar-readetexts-activity > sugar-viewslides > sugar-imageviewer For what it's worth, ImageViewer is definitely not collabo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread Seth Woodworth
Excellent! After I saw the olpcnews post I spent an hour or so last night doing the same thing. I'm glad I don't have to finish / fine-tune ^__^ +1 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 21:29, Josh Williams wrote: > > Thanks everyone, > > > > Gary mentio

Re: [Sugar-devel] cool animation w/ all-javascript space invaders

2009-06-05 Thread Felipe López Toledo
>create an Audio object that uses flash or >plugin media players in the background for backwards compatibility Yes, that's right. Since it exists "new Image()" new Audio() seems familiar. Thanks for your advise. 2009/6/4 Lucian Branescu > For sound, you'll either have to find a wrapper that ca

Re: [Sugar-devel] [math4] Activity Awards, Activity Alerts, Frame Alerts

2009-06-05 Thread Frederick Grose
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Gary C Martin wrote: ... FWIW, David Van Assche raised some interesting Activity ideas at > SugarCamp Paris and I'm interested/active in getting us to at lease > 'demo' state in the Sugar 0.86 release timeframe. The idea is to focus > on an 'awards' mechanism/style

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:42:05PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: >Maybe sugar-emulator *is* providing SUGAR_SCALING but instead of 100 it >is using 72? I believe it does. You should be able to look for yourself with "cat /usr/bin/sugar-emulator"

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:37:32PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >You are already on it by virtue of your work and contributions. Please >edit http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Packaging_Team and its pending >links/subpages as appropriate. Ok. I'l

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
Gary, Thanks for doing this. I wish I could say it cleared things up but I feel more confused than before. You say these are both XO's with different versions of Sugar. I thought that the font behavior on the XO was consistent, no matter what version of Sugar you used, but that you needed t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Frederick Grose
You are already on it by virtue of your work and contributions. Please edit http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Packaging_Team and its pending links/subpages as appropriate. Thank you for contributing so much already! --Fred On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Frederick Grose
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Collaboration_Central could be upgraded or migrated as a summary page or session report. --Fred On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM, James Simmons wrote: > David, > > Four of the Activities you will be testing use pretty much the same code > for collaboration: > > sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:22:03PM -0500, David Farning wrote: >The biggest value of a packaging team in my mind is to insure that >packagers and distributions have a well defined voice in the >ecosystem. >Our challenge over the next year will be

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
David, Four of the Activities you will be testing use pretty much the same code for collaboration: sugar-read sugar-readetexts-activity sugar-viewslides sugar-imageviewer Read Etexts and View Slides use code copied from Read. Image Viewer says in its comments that it uses code copied from Rea

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Library-1

2009-06-05 Thread Caroline Meeks
I installed again on a more recent snapshot and its working fine! On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:48:04PM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote: > > Or to be more specific. I see the UI but none of the things that are in > my > > Journal, which is what I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 21:29, Josh Williams wrote: > Thanks everyone, > > Gary mentioned > >    "Hey, fab, looking much cleaner/simpler/Sugar-like :-) One quick >    thought (will try to take a closer look later), would double >    thickness borders work better, make the colour theme pop a little >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [IAEP] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread Josh Williams
Thanks everyone, Gary mentioned "Hey, fab, looking much cleaner/simpler/Sugar-like :-) One quick thought (will try to take a closer look later), would double thickness borders work better, make the colour theme pop a little more, feel more robust? Regards, --Gary " I ag

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email

2009-06-05 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Oh, and enabling SSL would be appreciated too. IIRC we've discussed this on IRC and it isn't possible because we're on a shared host (mod_gnutls too unstable, openssl has no SNI support, no CA issues a combined certificate for d

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 05:14:08PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:14:01PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> So if Trac generically had some client-server ABI that I could expect >> would be available at many other Trac

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread David Farning
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >>David Van Assche surfaced the idea here, >>http://www.mail-archive.com/i...@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg04259.html, >>wit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:59:46AM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: >David Van Assche surfaced the idea here, >http://www.mail-archive.com/i...@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg04259.html, >with some recognition of the proposal. > >There seems to be a de-fac

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 18:40, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > Isn't it just the opposite of what you wrote?  My reading of the code > suggests that the SUGAR_SCALING environment variable was for everywhere BUT > the XO: > > http://api.sugarlabs.org/sugar.graphics.style-pysrc.html I think you are

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild - could not connect to server (http://svn.o-hand.com)

2009-06-05 Thread Bastien
Sascha Silbe writes: > What distribution and what kernel version do you run? You might be > affected by Debian bug #531338 [1] / Fedora bug #491839 [2]. > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/531338 That was it. Many thanks, -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mail

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
Josh, I attempted to upload Read Etexts to your site. The upload seemed to go OK but there is no Activity found yet. Maybe it needs to be promoted from the sandbox? James Simmons Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:23:34 -0700 From: Josh Williams Subject: [Sugar-devel] ASLO - rebranding To: Sugar Dev

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
Tomeu, Isn't it just the opposite of what you wrote? My reading of the code suggests that the SUGAR_SCALING environment variable was for everywhere BUT the XO: http://api.sugarlabs.org/sugar.graphics.style-pysrc.html James Simmons Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 17:32, James Si

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild - could not connect to server (http://svn.o-hand.com)

2009-06-05 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:12:46PM +0200, Bastien wrote: | *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [18/43] | svn checkout http://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-window-manager matchbox-window-manager | svn: OPTIONS of 'http://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-wind

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Frederick Grose
>Is there a wiki page to sign up and coordinate, or what's the procedure? >- Bert - http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collaboration_Testing is available for event references, documentation, etc. It is transcluded for now at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/Meetings --Fred ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild - could not connect to server (http://svn.o-hand.com)

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 18:12, Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > I can't check out sugar-jhbuild right now: > > , > | *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [18/43] > | svn checkout > http://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-window-manager > matchbox-window-manager > | svn: OPTIONS

[Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild - could not connect to server (http://svn.o-hand.com)

2009-06-05 Thread Bastien
Hi all, I can't check out sugar-jhbuild right now: , | *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [18/43] | svn checkout http://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-window-manager matchbox-window-manager | svn: OPTIONS of 'http://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk/matchbox-windo

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 17:32, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > I think I figured this out by looking at the code for sugar.graphics.style. >  It looks like my Sugar test environment needs to have an environment > variable SUGAR_SCALING defined and it needs to be given a numeric value.  If > I *don

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
Tomeu, I think I figured this out by looking at the code for sugar.graphics.style. It looks like my Sugar test environment needs to have an environment variable SUGAR_SCALING defined and it needs to be given a numeric value. If I *don't* have such a variable then the measurements are suited

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread David Van Assche
Yeah as stated, we will use the default jabber server which is the solutions grove one I guess... or are u talking about another one? David On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:38 PM, David Farning wrote: > David, > > Can you try to use the Solutions Groovy jabber server? Caroline and > Dave are putting so

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 17:11, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > The thing is, in the code below I *am* using style.zoom.  It seems to have > no effect at all. What I would have supposed that would work is using in 0.84 a fixed font size of 10 and on the XO style.zoom(X). I didn't wanted to imply t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email

2009-06-05 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:14:01PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: So if Trac generically had some client-server ABI that I could expect would be available at many other Trac installations, There's an XML-RPC plugin [1] that seems to be complete enough (though potentially buggy) for regular bug

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread James Simmons
Tomeu, The thing is, in the code below I *am* using style.zoom. It seems to have no effect at all. My test environment on Fedora 10 is .82. My XO, running the latest (I believe) release candidate of Sugar is .82. Most of the XO's that might use Read Etexts will be running .82 or worse and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Frederick Grose
David Van Assche surfaced the idea here, http://www.mail-archive.com/i...@lists.sugarlabs.org/msg04259.html, with some recognition of the proposal. There seems to be a de-facto team at work already. Here is a wiki home to start furnishing, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Packaging_Team. --Fr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Success at the Gardner!

2009-06-05 Thread James Zaki
Some people report the trackpad not working just for their Fedora installer. Not sure what you mean by "When the boothelper matched". Perhaps catch me on #sugar to discuss (jzGreen). James. 2009/6/5 Dave Bauer > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, James Zaki wrote: > >> On the macbook fro

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] progress report

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 16:26, Lucian Branescu wrote: > I gave up the pickling idea when I realised that XPCOM and GObject are > messy about that. > > > Activities have data and state, right? data is persistent throughout > different states and states are saved to the Journal. Oh, by data you are r

Re: [Sugar-devel] Random numbers and the Journal

2009-06-05 Thread James Zaki
> I'm using python's random.getrandbits() to generate unique identifiers in my program. However, I've discovered that when I start it from the Journal, I get errors, Perhaps its not the best practice to rely on a random number generator to give unique identifiers. Would you not store a number with

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread David Farning
David, Can you try to use the Solutions Groovy jabber server? Caroline and Dave are putting some very helpful resources behind cleaning up the server. david(The other one) On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Caroline Meeks wrote: > Hi David, > > Will you be using the server hosted by Solution Grove

Re: [Sugar-devel] Success at the Gardner!

2009-06-05 Thread Dave Bauer
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM, James Zaki wrote: > On the macbook front, I've started to chase the trackpad glitch upstream > with fedora. Am now running F11 on macbook5,1, but with external mouse. Will > update trac when I make progress. > James, i used the boothelper CD and if I used a boothe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Success at the Gardner!

2009-06-05 Thread James Zaki
On the macbook front, I've started to chase the trackpad glitch upstream with fedora. Am now running F11 on macbook5,1, but with external mouse. Will update trac when I make progress. Wifi and sound are not so bad to get going, but even then sound is not perfect. Wifi had issues due to broadcom's

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] progress report

2009-06-05 Thread Lucian Branescu
I gave up the pickling idea when I realised that XPCOM and GObject are messy about that. Activities have data and state, right? data is persistent throughout different states and states are saved to the Journal. Browse already saves the current page, the contents of the page and some metadata ab

Re: [Sugar-devel] Packaging Team (Was: Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git)

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:10:12PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 15:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:19:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 14:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Gary C Martin
On 5 Jun 2009, at 09:24, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 06:09, David Van Assche > wrote: >> Hi folks, >>We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week >> Wednesday >> 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm >> MST, and >> 12 pm PST,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 03:05:56PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:19:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > ...and finally creating an account for myself at that Trac thingy. Does it have an email interface, [..

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] progress report

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 16:01, Lucian Branescu wrote: > 2009/6/5 Tomeu Vizoso : >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 22:42, Lucian Branescu >> wrote: >>> 2009/6/4 Tomeu Vizoso : On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:00, Lucian Branescu wrote: > Since I missed the meeting, here goes. > > I've had a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] progress report

2009-06-05 Thread Lucian Branescu
2009/6/5 Tomeu Vizoso : > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 22:42, Lucian Branescu > wrote: >> 2009/6/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:00, Lucian Branescu >>> wrote: Since I missed the meeting, here goes. I've had a really hectic past few days, with 2 exams, just getting my >>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [IAEP] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread Sean DALY
Yes, much better integration with the rest of the site sections thanks Josh Sean On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, David Farning wrote: > Hey, > > That is awesome! > > david > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Josh Williams wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've been working on the css for ASLO, you

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] ASLO - rebranding

2009-06-05 Thread David Farning
Hey, That is awesome! david On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Josh Williams wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been working on the css for ASLO, you can see where I'm at > http://activities-devel.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/ . I've tried to make > this fairly consistent with the design of sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Packaging Team (Was: Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git)

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 15:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:19:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 14:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email

2009-06-05 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:19:52PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ...and finally creating an account for myself at that Trac thingy. Does it have an email interface, [...] There's a Trac plugin for creating new tickets for incoming emails, but nothing to manipulate (including commenting on) ex

[Sugar-devel] Packaging Team (Was: Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git)

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:19:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 14:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: htt

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Caroline Meeks
Hi David, Will you be using the server hosted by Solution Grove/Zill? We would be very happy if you did. We have seen mysterious spikes in resource usage that is not correlated to the number of users connected. I am suspicious that some of the activities use too many resources when they are sha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email (was: Re: hulahop autotools seems broken)

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:26:21PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:07:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> ...and finally creating an account for myself at that Trac thingy. >> Does it have an email interface, [...] >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 14:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>Please note that the journal is not an independent module sinc

Re: [Sugar-devel] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 05.06.2009, at 12:10, David Van Assche wrote: Ok, etoys included too.. Thanks :) Is it preinstalled on the "openSUSE sugar images" you mentioned? Are these the images you are referring to? http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Education/images/ Which collab server do you intend to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:09, David Van Assche wrote: > Well as we just discussed in irc, some activities will actually share and > allow for collaboration, but the vast majority do not and/or dont work > between different distribution methods. In any case we can certainly try > some out and send y

[Sugar-devel] Using Trac via email (was: Re: hulahop autotools seems broken)

2009-06-05 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:07:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ...and finally creating an account for myself at that Trac thingy. Does it have an email interface, [...] There's a Trac plugin for creating new tickets for incoming emails, but nothing to manipulate (including commenting on) ex

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 05.06.2009, at 06:09, David Van Assche wrote: Hi folks, We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week Wednesday 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm MST, and 12 pm PST, most of Europe that will be 9 pm, 8 pm for the UK) So you mean 19:0

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:22, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> As subject says, newest Journal release available at >>> http:/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> As subject says, newest Journal release available at >> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Journal/ (and not at >> suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:43:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. >> >>Hi,

Re: [Sugar-devel] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread David Van Assche
Ok, etoys included too.. On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 05.06.2009, at 06:09, David Van Assche wrote: > > Hi folks, >We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week Wednesday > 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm MST

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread David Van Assche
Well as we just discussed in irc, some activities will actually share and allow for collaboration, but the vast majority do not and/or dont work between different distribution methods. In any case we can certainly try some out and send you the log files to dissect, in case u cannot make it. kind r

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:43:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. > >Hi, have entered this ticket about it: > >http://dev.sugarlabs.org/t

Re: [Sugar-devel] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 05.06.2009, at 06:09, David Van Assche wrote: Hi folks, We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week Wednesday 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm MST, and 12 pm PST, most of Europe that will be 9 pm, 8 pm for the UK) So far we have 5

Re: [Sugar-devel] Searchable Tagging

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:25, kartik rustagi wrote: > Hello, > > I have started working on adding the feature of "Search able tags" to Sugar. > This will allow > the users to tag them self or any else in the network. These tag will be > generalized tags. Users >  will have the option to search for

Re: [Sugar-devel] More information on font scaling problem

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:40, James Simmons wrote: > I mentioned before that I'm having a font sizing problem on the XO > running .82.  When I set a font on a textviewer it looks OK running > under sugar-devel or SoaS by is *much* larger on the XO. Sorry, in an earlier email i replied to you what

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal activity release 101 not tagged in Git

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Hi, > > As subject says, newest Journal release available at > http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/sources/Journal/ (and not at > sugarlabs.org!), released january 2009, is not reflected as

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Hi, > > The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. Hi, have entered this ticket about it: http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/936 Do you have already a patch for this? If so,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Differing font sizes on the XO and in Sugar Emulation

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 00:12, James Simmons wrote: > Tomeu, > > Did you have a chance to try my Activity now that it has a font problem? > Any ideas? Sorry, haven't had time yet, please ping me again until I do it. > Also, is there some way I could tell if my Activity was running on an XO and > a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] collaboration testing session

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 06:09, David Van Assche wrote: > Hi folks, >    We are having a collaborative sugar testing session next week Wednesday > 10th June at 20:00 UTC (That is 4 pm EDT, 3pm EST, 2 pm CST, 1 pm MST, and > 12 pm PST, most of Europe that will be 9 pm, 8 pm for the UK) > > So far we h

Re: [Sugar-devel] cool animation w/ all-javascript space invaders

2009-06-05 Thread Bryan Berry
regrettably, i haven't tried it on the XO. given that there is no wireless where i am right now, probably won't try it immediately I see no reason why js animations can't work on the XO. It all depends on the particular user used. On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 10:03 +0200, NoiseEHC wrote: > Bryan Berry w

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] progress report

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 22:42, Lucian Branescu wrote: > 2009/6/4 Tomeu Vizoso : >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:00, Lucian Branescu >> wrote: >>> Since I missed the meeting, here goes. >>> >>> I've had a really hectic past few days, with 2 exams, just getting my >>> laptop back and constantly fightin

Re: [Sugar-devel] cool animation w/ all-javascript space invaders

2009-06-05 Thread Martin Langhoff
2009/6/5 NoiseEHC : > Have you tried it on an XO? I just had this "experience". Seems to me > that we will not do animation with js ever... Well, I don't think the js in that game is optimised at all. Very jerky on my mid-range (non-XO) laptop. There's lots of nice tricks you can do when scriptin

Re: [Sugar-devel] cool animation w/ all-javascript space invaders

2009-06-05 Thread NoiseEHC
Bryan Berry wrote: > http://static.boundvariable.com/space-invaders/ > > does most of the animation that we need using raphaeljs, which uses svg > and not canvas http://www.raphaeljs.com > > Have you tried it on an XO? I just had this "experience". Seems to me that we will not do animation with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Random numbers and the Journal

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 01:54, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > I'm using python's random.getrandbits() to generate unique identifiers in > my program.  However, I've discovered that when I start it from the > Journal, I get errors, which I can trace to the random number generator > producing the same