Re: [suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 06:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >>> Should I send a .spec file with the one line change  and a forged >>>  updated '%changelog', or can I ask you wonderful folks ups

Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules on RHEL4

2010-06-11 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Freitag, den 11.06.2010, 08:19 -0400 schrieb Dave B: > Though, perhaps not all of them are broken? > > I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3 > packages causing the issue. > I was just following the argumentation why they are "broken". I will have a look at those

[suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules on RHEL4

2010-06-11 Thread Dave B
Though, perhaps not all of them are broken? I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3 packages causing the issue. On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-requ...@lists.rpmforge.net wrote: > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:57:00 +0200 > From: Christoph Maser

Re: [suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Dag Wieers
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 06:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Should I send a .spec file with the one line change and a forged updated '%changelog', or can I ask you wonderful folks upstream to get that into play, please? I think asking the wonder

Re: [suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 06:19 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > lftp has an update published to version 4.0.8 with some minor > bugfixes. I just tested the existing 4.0.7 spec file from RPMforge, > updated to the 4.0.8 release, and it works fine. 4.0.8 SPEC has already been committed to the SVN

[suggest] Version 4.0.8 of lftp is out

2010-06-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good morning! lftp has an update published to version 4.0.8 with some minor bugfixes. I just tested the existing 4.0.7 spec file from RPMforge, updated to the 4.0.8 release, and it works fine. Should I send a .spec file with the one line change and a forged updated '%changelog', or can I ask you

Re: [suggest] broken dependencies for some perl modules on RHEL4

2010-06-11 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 10.06.2010, 15:01 -0400 schrieb Dave B: > If up2date is broken, fine... unfortunately, I think RHEL4 is in a state > where that particular bug won't be fixed by redhat, now. > > So, it would be good if the appropriate packages from rpmforge could be > patched to work around the