Re: [freenet-support] Update

thx ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Update

thx ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Update

On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just made a update to 6457, and now my node is some kind of doomed... > :/ For some reason the node removed all entrys from the routing table > and also does not get any new entrys. At least it did not stop > working, since it gets enough i

[freenet-support] Update

Just made a update to 6457, and now my node is some kind of doomed... :/ For some reason the node removed all entrys from the routing table and also does not get any new entrys. At least it did not stop working, since it gets enough inbound connections, but...I really loved that routing table :(

Re: [freenet-support] too much mem

I use many different OSes (including Linux) in different circumstances. I simply run Windows at home because it runs Windows apps that I use (Wine is still unreliable and slow). I am a strong believer in Linux and its security and reliability, but it simply does not support some of my hardware

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

inputBandwidthLimit=0 outputBandwidthLimit=4 Could've set it much higher, but didn't want to. Nikita. Toad wrote: Bandwidth? On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: No. Nikita. Toad wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wr

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

Bandwidth? On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: > No. > > Nikita. > > Toad wrote: > > >On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: > > > > > >>I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at > >>64MB. And FreeNet s

RE: [freenet-support] too much mem

Let's don't get into a O.S. war. Apple/Mac lovers eventually matured to realize that not everyone could be converted. I suspect that many refused to be converted because of prejudice of those rich Mac owners. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

[freenet-support] too much mem

Thanks Nikita, I guess if Winderz suits you thats fine. Hope you graduate to Linux some day... the weather is fine here. P.S. I had my Java topped at 200mb. I'll test 64 and see how she flies. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.g

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

No. Nikita. Toad wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at 64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 6

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: > I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at > 64MB. And FreeNet still works great. When I look at memory used in the > Environment on the gateway, it doesn't even use all of 64MB. I have > 256MB tot

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

ough FCP and do things like simplify splitfiles, insertions and the like with an interface that normal users could use. Sure, there's things such as fiw, but it's not the easiest of things to use. Having the whole feature set in one application would make it a lot nicer. -- Phillip Hutchings

[freenet-support] too much memory used

would do is > > allow for URLs to be to somewhere other than localhost, which can > > already be done (not sure if it has) by the server itself. This is > > better, because it doesn't require modifying a browser, and so far > > there's only one server. > > Or 1