-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2011 05:28 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:15:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Basically, you are vulnerable to your peers (those other freenet
nodes your node connects to). They know your IP address - they have
to to
One question about darknets
in a darknet only net
where lets say its 10 people
can they see stuff like linkarmageddon and other freesites or only the
content they share on the darknet?
if one node became a opennet hybrid will they be able to get to the rest
of freenet and freesites?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2011 10:08 AM, BoBeR wrote:
One question about darknets
in a darknet only net
where lets say its 10 people
can they see stuff like linkarmageddon and other freesites or only the
content they share on the darknet?
if one node became a
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:15:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Basically, you are vulnerable to your peers (those other freenet
nodes your node connects to). They know your IP address - they have
to to connect to you. They can identify you. As you rightly point
out, your peers can also, with a
On 07/26/2011 06:15 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote
The electronic attacks mentioned above are far cheaper than any scheme to try
to get people who run Freenet to spy on their friends. You can only spy on
your direct friends (well, it gets less accurate the more hops away the
target, but this
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/26/2011 06:15 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote
The electronic attacks mentioned above are far cheaper than any scheme to
try to get people who run Freenet to spy on their friends. You can only spy
on your direct friends
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:51 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ray Jones crawlz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 07/26/2011 06:15 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote
The electronic attacks mentioned above are far cheaper than any
scheme to try to get people who run Freenet to spy on
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:51:12 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
[...]
To summarize:
Lowest security, easiest to set up: run opennet.
Marginal improvement: run a hybrid Opennet/Darknet node. Mostly this
should be treated as a transition point to full Darknet, or a way to
help out your Darknet-only
On Wednesday 29 Jun 2011 14:46:06 Anonymous wrote:
This is sent anonymously, sorry if this message appears more than once.
The remailer network is not very reliable.
I see Matthew Toseland propagating darknet, connection to 'friends'
only, in favour of opennet.
Now since there is no way
This is sent anonymously, sorry if this message appears more than once.
The remailer network is not very reliable.
I see Matthew Toseland propagating darknet, connection to 'friends'
only, in favour of opennet.
Now since there is no way around the fact that 'friends' must know your
IP and it
This is sent anonymously, sorry if this message appears more than once.
The remailer network is not very reliable.
I see Matthew Toseland propagating darknet, connection to 'friends'
only, in favour of opennet.
Now since there is no way around the fact that 'friends' must know your
IP and it
11 matches
Mail list logo
