On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Michel Servaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently have a normal I386 pc (pentium IV - 1,6GHz with 512MB RAM and a
> 20GB HDD)...
> Let's say if I want to replace this with a Soekris unit... how should I
> compare this to a normal pc ?
>
> I have about 10 ipsec
I currently have a normal I386 pc (pentium IV - 1,6GHz with 512MB RAM
and a 20GB HDD)...
Let's say if I want to replace this with a Soekris unit... how should I
compare this to a normal pc ?
I have about 10 ipsec VPNs, 4 VLAN's, some traffic shaping and some
packages installed (I am planning o
I agree... and also try completely removing the Untangle box from the network
to see if the problem clears up.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Fr
ram,
This is a bit of a shot in the dark, but try turning off services in
Untangle... until they are all off. It may be that one of them (like
the Intrusion Detection module) is detecting something it doesn't like.
- Jason
From: ram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is likely that they are doing as I do... Use pfSense for firewall and
> VPN, while using Untangle for strictly filtering purposes (web, mail,
> etc) and not firewalling.
The conjecture is appreciated, but unless yo
It is likely that they are doing as I do... Use pfSense for firewall and
VPN, while using Untangle for strictly filtering purposes (web, mail,
etc) and not firewalling.
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:36 AM
To: support@pfsense.
> any one have idea, where iam doing wrong ?
Perhaps if you made it a little more clear why you're using two
firewall products in-line of each other and what role they're each
expected to play. There's likely some unexpected interplay between
the two, particularly with the effective MITM a captiv
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It sounds like google.com is not resolving when you have captive portal
> enabled. Make sure you have the DNS servers that are assigned to your users
> in the list of allowed outbound IPs in captive portal.
>
Hi
thanks for