I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
Sun Quad Fast Ethernet - not recognized
Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN
interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over
cable and configured both on the same net - couldn't access the
That NIC is not supported as far as I can tell. If you know the
device name in freebsd please let me know.Try removing the quad
port nic and I bet the single nic will work.
Scott
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
>
> Sun Quad Fast E
Quoth J B:
> I'm having issues with the following NIC cards:
>
> Intel Pro 100 - recognized, but doesn't seem to work - used it as my LAN
Am currently using a PRO 100 on a Routerboard 230.
pfSense 81.4, currently.
> interface - connected it back to back with another maching using a X-over
> c
the freebsd device name is hme:
The hme(4) driver supports the on-board Ethernet interfaces of many Sun
UltraSPARC workstation and server models. Cards supported by the
hme(4) driver include:
* Sun PCI SunSwift Adapter
* Sun SBus SunSwift Adapter .( hme. and .SUNW,hme.)
*
Quoth J B:
> As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1 Intel
> Pro 100 (stand alone), 1 Linksys Fast eth (shows up as dc0) and a 3com 3c509
In my case, the device name is fxp
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swiftouch,
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the freebsd device name is hme:
I have added device hme and the kernel is currently compiling. Unless
it errors out expect to see this in the next version.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-
yes - it shows up as fxp0 - but then I get errors loading microcode - and
it just don't work on the network
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 12:38 pm, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
> Quoth J B:
>
>
>> As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1
>> Intel
>> Pro 100 (stand alone), 1
At 12:48 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
yes - it shows up as fxp0 - but then I get errors loading microcode - and
it just don't work on the network
"gets errors". can you be more specific?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I
could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load
is timing out
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:08 pm, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> At 12:48 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
>
>> yes - it shows up as fxp0 - bu
At 01:12 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of me so I
could send the actual error - but it keeps saying that the microcoad load
is timing out
sounds like the nic is flaky. i'm running the same NIC on my pfsense
(as the LAN) and it works fin
I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer
NIC that you could try? I would rather not remove the microcode
support as it works wonders for newer cards.
Scott
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well - it keeps timing out, I wish I had the machine in front of m
Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have
older Pro100 cards - (trying to recycle some old equipment and make it
usefull again)
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:14 pm, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> I suspect the microcode is borking the NIC.Do you have a newer
> NIC th
Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then
tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to
or something...
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only have
> older Pro100 cards - (trying to recy
Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
Scott
On 9/29/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not easily. The code detects that you have a fxp driver and then
> tries to init the code. I suppose we could add a tag to
> or something...
>
> On 9/29/05, J B
At 01:31 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
syntax error in your change. the ')' should be a ']' ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
No, it was missing a ]
Thanks for the heads up!
On 9/29/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:31 PM 9/29/2005, you wrote:
> >Okay, try the newest /etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc and add this tag to
> >
>
> syntax error in your change. the ')' should be a ']' ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:40 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues
the freebsd device name is hme:
The hme(4) driver supports the on-board Ethernet interfaces of many Sun
UltraSPARC workstation and server models. Cards supported by the
hme(4)
Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
3c509 or 3c905?
The 509 is an ISA card which means you need to run the 3com util
3c5x9cfg (I think that's what its called) to make sure you don't have
any irq/io conflicts.
might have jumpers on the card in lieu of that, a few of them did.
Might also ha
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the
QFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4
interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fine
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 3:49 pm, Chris Buechler wrote:
> Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) wrote:
On 9/29/05, J B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until theQFE card is supported - because I only have 3 pci slots, and need 4interfaces) The 3C509 is an ISA card - and works just fineJB
Which QFE card is not supported?
Dave-- -
So what irqs are the 3com and Intel on?
-Original Message-
From: J B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues
The issue is the Intel Pro - not the 3C509 (I have to use this until the
QFE card
e.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues
Is there anyway to turn off the microcode on a per/NIC basis? I only
have
older Pro100 cards - (trying to recycle some old equipment and make it
usefull again)
JB
On Thu, September 29, 2005 1:14 pm, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> I suspect the microcode is
22 matches
Mail list logo
