On 2011/01/14 2:50, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
Well, if I can help
We have a PPPoE line for developing& tests.
I could setup a pfsense 2.0 Beta5 box and make you ssh login to it.
Then you, or other pfsense developer can debug it.
That would
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
>
> Well, if I can help
> We have a PPPoE line for developing & tests.
> I could setup a pfsense 2.0 Beta5 box and make you ssh login to it.
> Then you, or other pfsense developer can debug it.
>
That would be ideal, was going to ask for th
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
> On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Same here. No PPPOE support.
>>>
>> It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
>> don't work and we d
On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, "it
doesn't work" isn't helpful.
On 2011/01/13 9:20, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
Same here. No PPPOE support.
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, "it
doesn't work" isn't helpful.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
>
> Same here. No PPPOE support.
>
It works fine for the vast majority, there are some edge cases that
don't work and we don't know why yet at this point. Send logs, "it
doesn't work" isn't helpful.
-
On 2011/01/13 3:43, Charles N Wyble wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2011 12:30 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heinelt
wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2011 12:30 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
> On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heinelt
>> wrote:
>>> These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really
>>> work for
>>> me.
Same here.
On 2011/01/12 17:22, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really work for
me.
Till now, we used pfsense 1.2.3 and our PPPoE configuration worked without
any trouble.
But if I setup pfsense 2.0 Bet
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Maik Heinelt wrote:
> These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really work for
> me.
>
> Till now, we used pfsense 1.2.3 and our PPPoE configuration worked without
> any trouble.
> But if I setup pfsense 2.0 Beta 5 with exact the same settings, I
These days, I want to give verson 2.0 a try, but it doesn't really work
for me.
Till now, we used pfsense 1.2.3 and our PPPoE configuration worked
without any trouble.
But if I setup pfsense 2.0 Beta 5 with exact the same settings, I'm
always not able to reach internet.
The interface page in
11 matches
Mail list logo