Hello Sean
>Thanks, Keith.
>
>I just checked the KOH .pdf data sheet at TheChemistryStore.com, where I
>bought the KOH) & it says it's 100%. That doesn't seem exactly right,
>but it could explain the washing, given that I threw in a little extra.
And:
>The KOH is 90%. That's what I get for readi
The KOH is 90%. That's what I get for reading the "data sheet" instead
of the web page.
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 05:33 +0900, Keith Addison wrote:
> Hello Sean
>
> >Hi, Folks:
> >
> >I'm kind of new to the list; I've spent a lot of time in the
> >archives already, and I know this ground has been c
Thanks, Keith.
I just checked the KOH .pdf data sheet at TheChemistryStore.com, where I
bought the KOH) & it says it's 100%. That doesn't seem exactly right,
but it could explain the washing, given that I threw in a little extra.
A titration is a good idea. I was lazily avoiding it . . .
And,
Hello Sean
>Hi, Folks:
>
>I'm kind of new to the list; I've spent a lot of time in the
>archives already, and I know this ground has been covered. But any
>advice/input any of you want to share would be great. Oh, and: I'm
>an English professor, not a chemist, so my apologies for what must
>se
Hi, Folks:
I'm kind of new to the list; I've spent a lot of time in the archives
already, and I know this ground has been covered. But any advice/input
any of you want to share would be great. Oh, and: I'm an English
professor, not a chemist, so my apologies for what must seem like
sloppy lab docu
