Peter,
I agree.
It's certainly not perfect, however it's not nearly as bogus as what was
there previously.
I know maxusers is wrong, however what it really means, if you think
about it, is give me a scaling factor that is relative to physical ram,
BUT capped at some value so as to not
On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:13 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Peter,
I agree.
It's certainly not perfect, however it's not nearly as bogus as what was
there previously.
I know maxusers is wrong, however what it really means, if you think
about it, is give me a scaling factor that is relative
On 08.11.2012 08:46, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
[[ + peter ]]
Folks, I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out how to resolve
maxusers scaling in a happy way for all.
I think I came up with a solution.
This solution should
On 11/8/12 1:22 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:13 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Peter,
I agree.
It's certainly not perfect, however it's not nearly as bogus as what was there
previously.
I know maxusers is wrong, however what it really means, if you think about it, is
give
Peter, can you let me know what you think?
-Alfred
On 11/7/12 11:46 PM, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
[[ + peter ]]
Folks, I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out how to resolve
maxusers scaling in a happy way for all.
I
[[ + peter ]]
Folks, I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out how to resolve
maxusers scaling in a happy way for all.
I think I came up with a solution.
This solution should work for i386, and other 32 bit platforms, as well
as scaling well for 64 bit (or higher) platforms that have
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Alfred Perlstein bri...@mu.org wrote:
[[ + peter ]]
Folks, I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out how to resolve
maxusers scaling in a happy way for all.
I think I came up with a solution.
This solution should work for i386, and other 32 bit
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:46:21AM +, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Author: alfred
Date: Thu Oct 25 01:46:20 2012
New Revision: 242029
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242029
Log:
Allow autotune maxusers 384 on 64 bit machines
A default install on large memory machines
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: alfred
Date: Thu Oct 25 01:46:20 2012
New Revision: 242029
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242029
Log:
Allow autotune maxusers 384 on 64 bit machines
A default install on large memory
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:46:21AM +, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
...
Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_param.c
==
--- head/sys/kern/subr_param.c Thu Oct 25 01:27:01 2012
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 4:05:51 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 01:46:21AM +, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Author: alfred
Date: Thu Oct 25 01:46:20 2012
New Revision: 242029
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242029
Log:
Allow autotune maxusers
11 matches
Mail list logo