Salut, Marco,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:41 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote:
> What I'm trying to say is: As a mail service provider ("recipient
> side") you can use greylisting and if there are some buggy mailers
> out there in the internet (or in your local network) it's not a
> greylisting problem and
Hi Tonnerre,
You got me wrong :-)
What I'm trying to say is: As a mail service provider ("recipient side")
you can use greylisting and if there are some buggy mailers out there in
the internet (or in your local network) it's not a greylisting problem
and it's not your problem. they have to fix th
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:51:28AM +0200, Adrian Kägi wrote:
> Hmmm, i think it was/is (!) a fault from cc...
> I started a trouble ticket.
(!)
google is probably using some form of anycast.
(I would personnaly travel much more if crossing the atlantic had a cost of
50ms :-)
--
Philippe Straus
Hmmm, i think it was/is (!) a fault from cc...
I started a trouble ticket.
Thx for answer!
Adrian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 09:21
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [swinog
Hi,
http://www.swisscom.com/SCMCMS/Scripts/PopupJobEngine.aspx?frameurl=https://jobsp.swisscom.com/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/hrrcf_a_unreg_jo
b_search?sap-wd-configId=ZAPPLWI_UNREG
Search for: CBU-50315754
André
--
André Chapuis
Swisscom IP-Plus
Genfergasse 14
3050 Berne
+
nope, no clue...
i've not seen any issues or got any alarms.
maybe cablecom had (again?) bandwidth issues?
-steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Kägi
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [swinog] h
Yes and Some companies are using our DNS for repication.
Since then we have many DNS Requests.
- Original Message -
From: "Silvan Gebhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [swinog] WG: URIBL.COM ACL Change for 195.141.232.251
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> actually greylisting works pretty well, and the whitelist
> of exceptions is relatively small (not more than 300 entries as
> far as I remember). Also if you communicate the value
> of it to the customers, they tend to agree that having 90% of spam
> filtered before
Do you have clients using this DNS Server? I would see through the logs
- someone with a mailserver is using this DNS Box for all DNS queries
-> Has nothing to do with having mail services on it!
S.
Xaver Aerni schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> We receive yesterday this mail.
> It is verry interessing. T
Hello,
We receive yesterday this mail.
It is verry interessing. This is our DNS Server and some
Webservices and Monitoring Tools. We havn't any Mail Services
on this Server.
Did somebody know about this new Rules
Greetings Xaver
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: URIBL DNS Admin
10 matches
Mail list logo