Re: [swinog] RBL's (again) (Was: Anyone from Green here?)

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre Lombard
Salut, Marco, On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:15:41 +0200, Marco Fretz wrote: > What I'm trying to say is: As a mail service provider ("recipient > side") you can use greylisting and if there are some buggy mailers > out there in the internet (or in your local network) it's not a > greylisting problem and

Re: [swinog] RBL's (again) (Was: Anyone from Green here?)

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Marco Fretz
Hi Tonnerre, You got me wrong :-) What I'm trying to say is: As a mail service provider ("recipient side") you can use greylisting and if there are some buggy mailers out there in the internet (or in your local network) it's not a greylisting problem and it's not your problem. they have to fix th

Re: [swinog] high delay with icmp

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Strauss
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:51:28AM +0200, Adrian Kägi wrote: > Hmmm, i think it was/is (!) a fault from cc... > I started a trouble ticket. (!) google is probably using some form of anycast. (I would personnaly travel much more if crossing the atlantic had a cost of 50ms :-) -- Philippe Straus

Re: [swinog] high delay with icmp

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Kägi
Hmmm, i think it was/is (!) a fault from cc... I started a trouble ticket. Thx for answer! Adrian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 09:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [swinog

[swinog] Open position @IP+

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Andre Chapuis
Hi, http://www.swisscom.com/SCMCMS/Scripts/PopupJobEngine.aspx?frameurl=https://jobsp.swisscom.com/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/hrrcf_a_unreg_jo b_search?sap-wd-configId=ZAPPLWI_UNREG Search for: CBU-50315754 André -- André Chapuis Swisscom IP-Plus Genfergasse 14 3050 Berne +

Re: [swinog] high delay with icmp

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Steven.Glogger
nope, no clue... i've not seen any issues or got any alarms. maybe cablecom had (again?) bandwidth issues? -steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Kägi Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [swinog] h

Re: [swinog] WG: URIBL.COM ACL Change for 195.141.232.251

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Xaver Aerni
Yes and Some companies are using our DNS for repication. Since then we have many DNS Requests. - Original Message - From: "Silvan Gebhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:51 AM Subject: Re: [swinog] WG: URIBL.COM ACL Change for 195.141.232.251

Re: [swinog] RBL's (again) (Was: Anyone from Green here?)

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Marco Fretz
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > actually greylisting works pretty well, and the whitelist > of exceptions is relatively small (not more than 300 entries as > far as I remember). Also if you communicate the value > of it to the customers, they tend to agree that having 90% of spam > filtered before

Re: [swinog] WG: URIBL.COM ACL Change for 195.141.232.251

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Silvan Gebhardt
Do you have clients using this DNS Server? I would see through the logs - someone with a mailserver is using this DNS Box for all DNS queries -> Has nothing to do with having mail services on it! S. Xaver Aerni schrieb: > Hello, > > We receive yesterday this mail. > It is verry interessing. T

[swinog] WG: URIBL.COM ACL Change for 195.141.232.251

2008-10-20 Diskussionsfäden Xaver Aerni
Hello, We receive yesterday this mail. It is verry interessing. This is our DNS Server and some Webservices and Monitoring Tools. We havn't any Mail Services on this Server. Did somebody know about this new Rules Greetings Xaver > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: URIBL DNS Admin