Hello all
Our customers strictly want to get their mail - so we prefer flagging over
blocking. Looking around in my server logs (and postmaster accounts) makes
me feel that most ISPs today are much more in blocking. Don't they all have
huge problems with people complaining? We already have...
Reg
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Martin Ebnoether wrote:
> On the Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:35:55PM +0200, Tonnerre LOMBARD blubbered:
> > I think we should open up a new list called swinog-sales@ where
> > companies can advertise their products to each other. Of course,
>
> Make it an RSS-
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote:
> We're facing a growing amount of automatically generated HTTP POST
> requests, all containing spamvertising links like
We all do...
> a) Spamfilter of recipient shall filter that
If you are the only recipient and your spamfilt
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 04:31:01PM +0200, Matthias Hertzog wrote:
> Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL
> seems to be down / unreachable.
Same here. Neither bluewin.ch nor swisscom.ch nor ipplus.ch can be reached.
A customer having IPPLUS-Uplink is down too. Hi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Richard Klingler wrote:
> > Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL
> > seems to be down / unreachable.
>
> Nope...
[...]
> Tested from magnet/cyberlink.
It seems to be like that right now:
Cablecom: No chance
SolNet: Ext
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote:
> Richard Klingler a ?crit :
> > Matthias Hertzog schrieb:
> >> Is anyone out there able to connect to www.bluewin.ch? Even their ADSL
> >> seems to be down / unreachable.
> > Nope...
> >
> Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling the
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Marcel Prisi wrote:
> Cablecom is mostly down ... try calling their support !
I have no problems reaching Cablecom Websites and our own Servers through
SolNet. I don't think SolNet is connected to Cablecom - but I might be wrong.
Regards
Peter
--
Wer
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Nik Hug wrote:
> >>Tested from magnet/cyberlink.
> >
> >It seems to be like that right now:
> >Cablecom: No chance
>
> yeap there is somethink ongoing.
> traceroutes outbound from ip+ in direction cablecom/former solpa stopped
> at i79tix-015-xxx1-1.bb.ip
Hello
I have some urgent work to do needing Novell's website. A traceroute looks
like that:
5 62-2-74-177.static.cablecom.ch (62.2.74.177) 6.714 ms 4.109 ms 4.693
ms
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 ch-gva01a-ra1-so-0-0-0.aorta.net (213.46.171.1) 16.105 ms 18.989 ms
18.040 ms
9 fr-par02a-rd1-pos-
Hi
Philippe Strauss schrieb:
AS6730 is unreachable for at least us (DFi, AS12333) and
anonymouse.org.
I've tried our both upstreams AS702 and AS5511 with the same
result.
verified using www.romandie.com (195.141.38.35) and www.sunrise.ch as
(195.141.106.96) target adresses.
BGP table looks f
Hi
Philippe Strauss schrieb:
AS6730 is unreachable for at least us (DFi, AS12333) and
anonymouse.org.
I've tried our both upstreams AS702 and AS5511 with the same
result.
verified using www.romandie.com (195.141.38.35) and www.sunrise.ch as
(195.141.106.96) target adresses.
BGP table looks f
Hi
Ammann, Marc schrieb:
Something is going on
Some traffic drop since 16:00
Let me know if you have some additional info's (private mail would be
preferred)
No config changes today :-/
That's the internet. If you don't break it yourself somebody else will
be glad to do it for you
Hello
Per Jessen schrieb:
Philip Iezzi wrote:
TAP/UCP protocol, attached ISDN-Modem
[...]
It's a little expensive if you have many SMS'es - does anyone know who
to contact (e.g. at Swisscom) to get a package-deal with a direct TCP
interface?
There's a service provider called "aspsms" we use
Hi
Daniel Kamm schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Guhl wrote:
Major drawback: If your link is broken, you won't get alarmed!
Of course.
Something like this would be nice:
if (aspsms available)
send_via_aspsms
else
send_via_attached_gsm
That's easy to scr
Alexandre Suter schrieb:
In the judgment posted by Xaver [3], on page 3 the judge considers that
the "or" in the list of elements means that only one criteria needs to
be satisfied: as long as either the sender is correctly identified or
they tell you how to opt-out, it's ok. (At least that's how
Per Jessen schrieb:
Xaver Aerni wrote:
Hallo,
Der Kanton Zug hat das erste Urteil gegen das Antispamgesetz
verkündet. Dabei stellte es sich auf den gesichtspunkt, dass ein
Abmeldelink alleine genügt. Auf die Punkte, das der Kläger weder eine
Einwilligung gegeben habe und auch keine Geschäftsbez
Hi
Fredy Kuenzler schrieb:
> Peter Keel schrieb:
>> * on the Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:54:11AM +0100, Marc Hauswirth wrote:
>>> block their Internet access to block pedophile content.
>> The opposite of "good" is "good intent".
>
> As said earlier, IMHO the authorities should purchase the system fo
Oli Schacher schrieb:
> Is there any chance Swisscom could change these antispam error messages
> to CLEARLY indidicate they are generated by the Swisscom servers?
You seem to have got an old message somehow. I got one today from the
first one of our customers which is affected and this one was st
Am 25.10.10 13:47, schrieb Jeroen Massar:
On 2010-10-25 12:49, Manfredo Miserocchi wrote:
users coming from Apple stores with their new IPhone, cannot send out their
e-mail from a day to another and they're not
understanding why :D
Just one comment: Apple "Geniuses" should know better...
Am 21.09.2012 18:21, schrieb Alexandre Egger:
For those of you who have some spare time this weekend, there is a piece
of entertainment written by the so-called USA government which sack
[...]
[…]
*Switzerland*
Switzerland’s copyright law is inadequate, making it a home for rogue
sites whose
Hi
Tobias Goeller schrieb:
> I have a current malicious traffic of about 100KBit/s coming from some
> chinese ISPs... most time they try to accesss ports 138/139 and 445.
That's incomming traffic, I guess. Blocking that is a good idea.
Blocking outgoing smb is not entirely pointless too since it
Hello
Benoit Panizzon schrieb:
I just got in contact with the swiss advocate of a company who sends us such
messages about our users sharring copyrighted content.
[...]
So ist this true? Do most of you guys issue warning to your users if you get
such messages?
IANAL and I am not an ISP (curr
Hi
Jeroen Massar schrieb:
Roger Schmid wrote:
[..]
Otherwise spammers would open 100th's of free accounts and use them
to send spam from
non-bluewin IPs :-/
I see the problem, but perhaps something like a captcha would also be
sufficient to prevent this.
SMTP-Captcha's? :)
I guess he mea
Hi
Rainer Duffner schrieb:
Jeroen Massar schrieb:
Do you have a current, working example for that?
(Just for research purposes, of course)
;-
Well, I found an article mentioning the idea:
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/01/27/solving-and-creating.html
But it doesn't seem to provide an impl
Adrian Ulrich schrieb:
I see the problem, but perhaps something like a captcha would also be
sufficient to prevent this.
It wouldn't prevent it, it just makes it harder. (Some spammers don't even use
bots to create accounts. Using real people appears to be cheaper sometimes..)
It always takes
Mike Kellenberger schrieb:
> Let's discuss it some more and we'll make news on heise.de once again
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Schweizer-Richterin-verlangt-Website-Sperrung-von-Providern--/meldung/33051
> :-)
I submitted it to symlink.ch. ISPs can't take over responsibility for
the behavio
Andreas Fink schrieb:
> its getting worse:
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderporno-Sperren-Provider-sollen-Nutzerzugriffe-loggen-duerfen--/meldung/136450
Well, it depends. While blocking without loggin isn't good for anything
at all and logging without blocking would be a rather good idea
Andy Davidson schrieb:
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 21:49, Peter Guhl Listenempfänger wrote:
>
>> Well, it depends. While blocking without loggin isn't good for
>> anything at all
>
> In the UK we have -- we are told -- blocking without logging, because
> the intent o
28 matches
Mail list logo
