Why is it important? The main thing that matters is than only one
definition exists for an item, irrespective of how often it is used.
A few months ago I looked a TagInfo for tags that people are using but
have no Wiki entry. Once you get closer to like 100 uses and below you
find a lot of
On 18.04.2015 09:31, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
So far we have 3 parameters: number of OSM objects, number of real-word
objects, number of users. Let's put them into a formula in order to enable
objective decisions and avoid edit wars.
I don't think it's as easy as that. Other things to
Why is it important? The main thing that matters is than only one
definition exists for an item, irrespective of how often it is used.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
On 18.04.2015 09:31, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
So far we have 3 parameters: number of
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote:
I recently came across a never proposed tag with some 600 uses marked
de-facto. If that's the way to bypass the proposal process, I will
never care about proposals any more.
How do you know there was any intent to
On 17/04/2015 14:38, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
A more useful metric is how many different contributors used the tag.
Is anyone aware of any analysis of who (or how many users) first used
particular tags, or who (or how many users) accepted a tag by making a
subsequent change to an object?
It will be hard to come up with a number to distinguish between the two. As
others have pointed out on this mailing list before, the actual number of
items that can be tagged with a certain tag matters.
So in case there are only 600 items in the whole world of that thing, it
is de-facto. If there
