Hi,
I have been looking through the wiki for more information about "appopriate
data".
I would like to meet more of the people storing information about "presence
of species", flora or fauna, inside the OSM db.
I see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species
and
http://tagstat.hypercube.
> The following are the changeset tags used at least 100 times as of a couple
> weeks ago
Many thanks for those very usefull statistics.
> A few comments on the ones that may not be obvious:
>
> Build/version are used by some editors to expand on created_by
I might gather those in a "automatica
> From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:41 PM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets
>
> Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks for your proposal. I c
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your proposal. I commented it.
Those were very good comment, I integrated most of them. But I'm usure if
"bot=yes" wasn't allready used. If that was the case, I think compatibility
with what has been done is more important
Le 21/10/2012 19:49, sly (sylvain letuffe) a écrit :
Hi,
Regardless of what comes out from my previous email about the 2nd mandatory
account, I think Richard proposition (yes, I really like it !) is something we
should start using.
Taking into account the rather badly named tagged richard expos
Hi,
Regardless of what comes out from my previous email about the 2nd mandatory
account, I think Richard proposition (yes, I really like it !) is something we
should start using.
Taking into account the rather badly named tagged richard exposed (I'm kidding
! But I do take into account answere
2012/10/21 sly (sylvain letuffe) :
> - People will still make errors like uploading non import changeset with their
> import account, and in case of revert make it hard to find out.
that's a general problem with all kind of edits and ways of marking
the source and nature of an edit: mistakes happ
Hi,
( Concerning the current discussion about french cadastre import, but also
could apply to other types of imports, and following Richard's proposition. )
In order to try reaching a more peacefull atmosphere about the french cadastre
import, I'd like to suggest an alternative to the current
On 2012-10-21 15:17, Paweł Paprota wrote:
Polish page also has been reverted (yesterday):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Relation:restriction&action=history
It's not a revert, it's just a warning about this problem. (I'm surprised how
well google translated this...)
_
Polish page also has been reverted (yesterday):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Pl:Relation:restriction&action=history
Paweł
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012, at 12:00, Cobra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> those of you reading tagging@ might have noticed a similar thread two
> weeks ago:
> http://lis
Cartinus wrote:
> So again no real argument why when a Frenchmen uploads thousands of
> buildings a day he is doing something really different than someone of a
> different nationality doing the same.
No difference. The difference is not French/Others but more Bulk Import
of raw data and import
something you all should be aware of: "*Chinese customs to seize devices
with illegal maps*"
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-10/16/c_131910411.htm
Regrds
walter
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/China-s-maps-to-be-closely-monitored-for-more-accuracy
Hi all,
those of you reading tagging@ might have noticed a similar thread two weeks
ago: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-October/011573.html
Someone in the German forum noticed that the German version has also been
changed by Gauß. There seems to be a consensus that Gauß h
13 matches
Mail list logo
