[OSM-talk] State of the Map US: Upcoming deadlines

2013-04-23 Thread Alex Barth
Hello everyone - Quick reminder: There are two upcoming deadlines for Sate of the Map US: - **Today** - last opportunity to submit a scholarship application - **Sunday** - last opportunity for submitting a talk If you know someone who you'd love to see speak at the State of the Map US in San Fra

Re: [OSM-talk] Call for Presentations - SotM 2013 (annual conference)

2013-04-23 Thread Rob Nickerson
Just to add a little more to the Call for Presentations: This year I personally want to try and get as many people involved as possible. We are therefore hoping to have a Poster Exhibition for people who may not be able to attend in person (we can print them locally). If this sounds interesting to

[OSM-talk] Call for Presentations - SotM 2013 (annual conference)

2013-04-23 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi All, - please forward this on to your local communities - It's that time of year again when we look to you, the mind-bogglingly creative OpenStreetMap community, to tell us what you've been up to. That's right - it time to submit your presentation ideas for the annual State of the Map conferen

Re: [OSM-talk] Join my network on LinkedIn

2013-04-23 Thread निशांत / Nishant
Sorry for this! New to android and it sent invite to the whole list. Regards, Nishant On Apr 23, 2013 9:40 PM, "Nishant Sharma" wrote: ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Join my network on LinkedIn

2013-04-23 Thread Nishant Sharma
LinkedIn Nishant Sharma has indicated you are a Friend -- I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. Accept invitation from Nishant Sharma http://www.linkedin.com/e

Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

2013-04-23 Thread Clifford Snow
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > It'd be good to release Leaflet/OpenLayers plugins to do the attribution. > If > I were feeling Machiavellian I'd suggest we consider hosting them on our > servers (load permitting) so we get an automatic heads-up of who's using > OSM..

Re: [OSM-talk] Native American/First Nation, etc. Reservation Boundaries

2013-04-23 Thread Robin Paulson
On 2013-04-20 09:49, Clifford Snow wrote: I think I understand that the existing administrative levels dont work. In the US at least, the reservations have a  "domestic dependent nation" status.  They are not States, Counties yet contain cities. The often extend past state boundaries, and certain

Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

2013-04-23 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Thumbs up. This is really good. I love having "Local knowledge" in prime > position. > > -1 If the most important information is the "local knowledge" and "community driven", then the page should be renamed as the "about the project" and

Re: [OSM-talk] RFC updated: OSM Attribution Mark (was: contributor mark)

2013-04-23 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Alex Barth wrote: > This is an updated proposal based on an initial RFC from earlier this > year titled "Contributor Mark" [1, 2]. Thumbs up. This is really good. I love having "Local knowledge" in prime position. It'd be good to release Leaflet/OpenLayers plugins to do the attribution. If I wer

Re: [OSM-talk] Contents of talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33

2013-04-23 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, St Niklaas wrote: > > From: talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33 > > St.niklaas, I already sent you privately a first message asking you to disable the "digest" option in your mailing list subscription. You send more and mor

Re: [OSM-talk] Contents of talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33

2013-04-23 Thread St Niklaas
> From: talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: talk Digest, Vol 104, Issue 33 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:49:09 + > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 13:49:00 -0500 > From: Paul Johnson > To: Martin Koppenhoefer > Cc: "talk@openstreetmap.org" > Subject: Re: