I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M
the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is UNDER
the river even though it has layer=1
--
Jakub A. Tesinsky (j(a)kub.cz)
tel: 7778 JAKUB, web: ja.kub.
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
>
> I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M
>
> the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is UNDER
> the river even though it has layer=1
>
Does highway=
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>
> Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
>>
>> I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M
>>
>> the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is U
On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M
the construction site (northern part of th
On 18 Jul 2011, at 09:17, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote:
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?l
2011/7/18 Thomas Davie :
> At least in my mental model of how rendering is expected to work, layer=
> should have priority over *all* other rendering order stuff.
then you can file a ticket for the mapnik OSM-style. The makers of
that style have decided to ignore the layer tags in some cases, e.
6 matches
Mail list logo