[OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-17 Thread Jakub
I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is UNDER the river even though it has layer=1 -- Jakub A. Tesinsky (j(a)kub.cz) tel: 7778 JAKUB, web: ja.kub.

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-18 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote: > > I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M > > the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is UNDER > the river even though it has layer=1 > Does highway=

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-18 Thread Thomas Davie
On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > > Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote: >> >> I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the: >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M >> >> the construction site (northern part of the "Steinere Brucke" is U

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-18 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote: On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote: I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.023336&lon=12.097374&zoom=18&layers=M the construction site (northern part of th

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-18 Thread Thomas Davie
On 18 Jul 2011, at 09:17, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 7/18/2011 3:38 AM, Thomas Davie wrote: >> >> On 18 Jul 2011, at 08:33, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> >>> >>> Bugzilla from j...@kub.cz wrote: I think there is a but in Mapnik. Look at the: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?l

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik bug? construction bridge site (over the water)

2011-07-18 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/7/18 Thomas Davie : > At least in my mental model of how rendering is expected to work, layer= > should have priority over *all* other rendering order stuff. then you can file a ticket for the mapnik OSM-style. The makers of that style have decided to ignore the layer tags in some cases, e.