[OSM-talk] proposal: relation type=way_affected (on the beginning of the street)

2008-11-06 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Hallo. Just on the beginning of the private way is one of the common places for barriers. Its mapping makes an apparent clash between reality and mapping schematic - there is no way to mark this fact exactly. http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.071094lon=14.425607zoom=18layers=B000FFF You

Re: [OSM-talk] proposal: relation type=way_affected (on the beginning of the street)

2008-11-06 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Rory McCann wrote: On 06/11/08 08:27, Stanislav Brabec wrote: Just on the beginning of the private way is one of the common places for barriers. Its mapping makes an apparent clash between reality and mapping schematic - there is no way to mark this fact exactly.

Re: [OSM-talk] proposal: relation type=way_affected (on the beginning of the street)

2008-11-06 Thread Ed Loach
Renderers have no idea about exact way width and attempt to render the barrier inside the schematic line of the main way (exactly on the place veery close to the start of the private way). So the relation is to try and overcome a problem with the renderers, rather than a problem with

Re: [OSM-talk] proposal: relation type=way_affected (on the beginning of the street)

2008-11-06 Thread Rory McCann
On 06/11/08 08:27, Stanislav Brabec wrote: Hallo. Just on the beginning of the private way is one of the common places for barriers. Its mapping makes an apparent clash between reality and mapping schematic - there is no way to mark this fact exactly.

Re: [OSM-talk] proposal: relation type=way_affected (on the beginning of the street)

2008-11-06 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo. Just on the beginning of the private way is one of the common places for barriers. Its mapping makes an apparent clash between reality and mapping schematic - there is no way to mark this fact exactly.