On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Ben Laenen wrote:
> MP wrote:
>> So currently, if I want to know "how was the way drawn in time T", I
>> had to get history of the way, then find out which nodes were used by
>> the way in time T, then get history from each of the nodes and pick
>> appropriate node
On 14 Jun 2009, at 01:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> There are no full history dumps currently - having such dump would
>> enable this type of query quite easily.
>
> I am sure we will have them at some point in time.
>
>> Well, there could be slight problem with pre-0.6 data (no order in
>>
MP wrote:
> So currently, if I want to know "how was the way drawn in time T", I
> had to get history of the way, then find out which nodes were used by
> the way in time T, then get history from each of the nodes and pick
> appropriate node from the history, given the time. Then combine this
> int
2009/6/14 MP :
> Perhaps this could be improved in 0.7, by having some
> "[way|relation]/#id/history-full" call, which will return history of
> referenced way (or relation), including history of all node (ways)
> that was referenced at least in one of the historic or current
> versions. Sort of co
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Only if you save it. If you use the "edit with save" mode and don't save,
> you can just look.
What I've always thought could be useful is that when you select an
earlier version from the popup, it would show on the map as well. Often
there's multiple previous edits,
MP wrote:
> Well, potlatch have feature of reverting to earlier version of
> way, but doesn't that reverting have a side effect of actually
> reverting the way?
Only if you save it. If you use the "edit with save" mode and don't save,
you can just look.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > Perhaps this could be improved in 0.7, by having some
> > "[way|relation]/#id/history-full" call, which will return history of
> > referenced way (or relation), including history of all node (ways)
> > that was referenced at least in one o
On 14/06/2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> MP wrote:
> > So currently, if I want to know "how was the way drawn in time T",
> > I had to get history of the way, then find out which nodes were used
> > by the way in time T, then get history from each of the nodes and
> > pick appropriate node
Hi,
> There are no full history dumps currently - having such dump would
> enable this type of query quite easily.
I am sure we will have them at some point in time.
> Well, there could be slight problem with pre-0.6 data (no order in
> relations) and pre-0.5 (extra segment elements in addition
MP wrote:
> So currently, if I want to know "how was the way drawn in time T",
> I had to get history of the way, then find out which nodes were used
> by the way in time T, then get history from each of the nodes and
> pick appropriate node from the history, given the time. Then
> combine thi
MP wrote:
>
> There are no full history dumps currently - having such dump would
> enable this type of query quite easily. I think the daily diffs could
> be used for help if the changes are fresh (less than 14 days). Are
> there any nearby plans for full history dumps? This shouldn't probably
> be
> If you often have this kind of query, consider downloading and suitably
> preparing some old planet files for quick access to old data with proper
> referential integrity.
I don't think this is possible for me, as having several old planet
files in state where it could be quickly searched (so p
Hi,
MP wrote:
> So currently, if I want to know "how was the way drawn in time T", I
> had to get history of the way, then find out which nodes were used by
> the way in time T, then get history from each of the nodes and pick
> appropriate node from the history, given the time. Then combine this
13 matches
Mail list logo
