On 6/26/2016 10:11 AM, cleary wrote:
Thanks to Simon and Andrew for your responses which I now understand.
Can I now follow-on and request clarification about other data from
data.gov.au - for example the sources listed in the wiki for
Queensland Local Government Areas and QLD Suburb/Locality
Thanks to Simon and Andrew for your responses which I now understand.
Can I now follow-on and request clarification about other data from
data.gov.au - for example the sources listed in the wiki for Queensland
Local Government Areas and QLD Suburb/Locality Boundaries which are CC-BY-
4.0 but do n
The simple answer is "NO", the G-NAF data is published under a non-open
custom licence and currently can not be used directly in OSM.
Every communication we've had with the relevant authorities has
indicated that they are at this time not moving away from the non-open
licence. This may change in t
Hmmm,
If I just delivered mail to particular addresses (as I did to 150 today, have a
list of addresses) does that mean that these addresses are now able to be
imported from the GNAF?
Maybe I need to tag them as note:letterbox verified or note:GNAF import ok?
I’m not being flippant, and I thin
On 25 June 2016 at 13:35, cleary wrote:
> I'm sorry that I'm slow in picking up an old thread from about six months
> ago but I remain uncertain about the implications.
>
> As I understand the situation, the licence that accompanies the GNAF
> (address) data from data.gov.au is not itself adequate
Ok this should be all reverted now.
On 25 June 2016 at 09:12, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Ok, reverting the FIX SOURCES changesets in progress, it could take a while
> to finish, it's been running overnight and still going.
>
> 40207793
> 40207001
> 40206754
> 40206373
> 40206195
> 40206035
> 40205790
6 matches
Mail list logo