Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Gids zie je dat Hof ter Mereweg 43 in de Kosbeekweg ligt Guy Vanvuchelen Van: Sander Deryckere [mailto:sander...@gmail.com] Verzonden: zaterdag 7 februari 2015 10:45 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium Op 6 februari 2015 20

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Op 6 februari 2015 20:24 schreef Guy Vanvuchelen : > Een probleem is dat soms de nummering van één straat doorloopt in een > aanliggende straat. Bijv. de nummering van de Hof ter Mereweg loopt door in > de Kosbeekweg. Dus een adres in de Kosbeekweg is eigenlijk: addr: street = > Hof ter Mereweg.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jo wrote: > I'm the only one who's sad for their disappearance :-) > > Are you guys deleting the ones in Brussels as well? > I'm only deleting the ones I created. Since it seemed like I was to only one maintaining them in my area, they became incomplete anyway. I

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

I'm the only one who's sad for their disappearance :-) Are you guys deleting the ones in Brussels as well? Anyway, I have my hands full with mapping public transport and lately I'm looking into traffic signs and Mapillary, so, I guess, since I'm not mapping addresses anyway, I'd better just shut

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

No problem, I delete them as well :-) On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Glenn Plas wrote: > existing address relations: I delete those of streets I completed. > With pain in the heart as lots of it is Marc's (Escada) work. > ___ Talk-be mailing list Tal

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

I usually start by mapping the houses first, without addresses for a big area. I always map everything I see when I do 1 street, even if I don't do the addresses right away, that is really the best way to reach completion quickly, to map on the side while addressing 1 street. Sometimes weeks go by

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Zal morgen eens kijken naar die doorlopende nummers. Een straat moet niet beginnen bij 1 en 2, en de straatnaam in het adres is niet altijd de dichtstbijzijnde straat. Did is en adres op zich tamelijk abstract. Zo is er de baan tussen Roeselare en Menen in gemeente Moorslede. Eerst is er een deel

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

On 2015-02-06 15:33, Sander Deryckere wrote : Hi, maybe some of you have seen it already, but I graphed some of the address evolution in Belgium: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sanderd17/diary/34332

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

I think resources differ a lot between the 3 regions, but I don't think it differs a lot from province to province otherwise. I don't know about WMS 4326, I'm not that into imagery stuff. Op 6-feb.-2015 19:51 schreef "André Pirard" : > On 2015-02-06 15:33, Sander Deryckere wrote : > > Hi, > > m

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Van: Sander Deryckere [mailto:sander...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 18:13 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium Als je fouten ziet, dan moet je ze melden bij de gemeente via LARA (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

I did a few of those indeed. It's addictive :) On 06-02-15 16:04, Marc Gemis wrote: > Vlaams-Brabant -> Glenn Plas using AGIV data. > > :-) > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Sander Deryckere > wrote: > > Hi, > > maybe some of you have seen it already,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

On 2015-02-06 15:33, Sander Deryckere wrote : Hi, maybe some of you have seen it already, but I graphed some of the address evolution in Belgium: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sanderd17/diary/34332

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

mers zullen ingebracht worden. > > > > Guy Vanvuchelen > > > > *Van:* Sander Deryckere [mailto:sander...@gmail.com] > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 6 februari 2015 16:22 > *Aan:* OpenStreetMap Belgium > *Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium > > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

[mailto:sander...@gmail.com] Verzonden: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 16:22 Aan: OpenStreetMap Belgium Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium Well, Vlaams-Brabant does have a very steady incline. Even steadier than other provinces, and long before Agiv data was released. But yes, I do

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Well, Vlaams-Brabant does have a very steady incline. Even steadier than other provinces, and long before Agiv data was released. But yes, I do think that one person can do a lot of address mapping, enough to influence the graph severely. 2015-02-06 16:04 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > Vlaams-Brabant

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

plus deze dappere inboorling van Haacht die enige manuele effort inbrengt... maar Glenn zijn werk zal allicht efficiënter zijn, jawel. KA On 06-02-15 15:04, Marc Gemis wrote: Vlaams-Brabant -> Glenn Plas using AGIV data. :-) On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Sander Deryckere

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Vlaams-Brabant -> Glenn Plas using AGIV data. :-) On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Sander Deryckere wrote: > Hi, > > maybe some of you have seen it already, but I graphed some of the address > evolution in Belgium: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sanderd17/diary/34332 > > It's strange how di

[OSM-talk-be] Address evolution in Belgium

Hi, maybe some of you have seen it already, but I graphed some of the address evolution in Belgium: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sanderd17/diary/34332 It's strange how different provinces differ that much, and the Urbis import is also very clear of course. Regards, Sander __