Luc Van den Troost wrote:
> > Interesting fact, I personally didn't know that a road lost its national
> > number if it was transferred towards the local govornments. In fact
> > weren't there cases in the past where a provincial road had a national
> > number? They barely exist nowadays since most
> >
> Interesting fact, I personally didn't know that a road lost its national
> number if it was transferred towards the local govornments. In fact
> weren't there cases in the past where a provincial road had a national
> number? They barely exist nowadays since most provinces transferred
Ben Laenen wrote:
> For Wallonia, there's a map here: http://carto-
> inter.met.wallonie.be/dg1/viewer.htm?Layers=011010101001&Ac
>tiveLayer=16&title=Le%20r%C3%A9seau%20routier%20de%20la%20R%C3%A9gion%20wall
>onne
For Flanders I can only find these maps:
Antwerpen:
http://wegen.vl
Kenny Moens wrote:
> Is there somewhere an official source from the government on which roads
> still have an official number? Until now I've found this document:
> http://www.wegeninfo.be/pdf/nummeringwegennet.pdf, but I believe its
> kinda outdated.
For Wallonia, there's a map here: http://carto
Kenny Moens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 18/08/2009 13:24, Ben Laenen wrote:
> > The N286 is no longer a secondary road. The Flemish Region has given the
> > road to the municipalities (Haacht, Herent and Rotselaar), so it's no
> > longer the N286. A little bit of googling will direct you towards the
> >
So far , Istill use my old scheme : Nx, Nxx -> primary , Nxxx -> secondary ,
Downgrade when Nx(xx)[a-z] and eventually adapt to terrain , tertiary for
important connecting roads(even not numbered) between villages...
True, similar case seems to exist in Aarschot where the N19/N10 cross
> the city
Hello,
On 18/08/2009 13:24, Ben Laenen wrote:
> The N286 is no longer a secondary road. The Flemish Region has given the road
> to the municipalities (Haacht, Herent and Rotselaar), so it's no longer the
> N286. A little bit of googling will direct you towards the texts of the
> Staatsblad.
>
> Bu
Kenny Moens wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> On the wiki page the conventions for "primary/secondary/tertiary" roads
> are marked with question marks. Is there already a formal definition for
> those? Until now I've always applied these rules and they apply pretty
> good, however... some road I have proble
Hi Kenny,
I think I vaguely know that road, the section you describe, and indeed
it looks more like a very local road instead of a main road.
As most connecting, and more important roads, are secondary, it might be
wise to 'scale it down' to tertiary.
I have been doing some mapping in the Chim
