Re: [Talk-ca] NRN Map chart & CanVec Updat

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
hi, Yes, it has been discussed. (somewhere back in the archives) It's on my list of things todo. Make a wiki page about this issue, and what the answer (consensus is) cheers, sam On 2/25/09, Michael dos Santos wrote: > Has anyone looked at pulling road names out of the StatsCanada 2005 Road > N

[Talk-ca] man_made=pipeline - layer and/or location?

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, this might be old news, (as voting has passed) but it's worth mentioning. came up when discussing http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec:_Energy On the wiki for it, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline refers to "location" rather than "layer". So does this map feature

Re: [Talk-ca] Review of CanVec:Energy theme

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks, Opps, I was thinking "layer" rather than "level" but still, looking at the wiki, it looks like the term "location" is used. Yup, thats more clear :) So i removed the reference to it at the top of the Energy page. However, i do see a conflict of interest here. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ca] Review of CanVec:Energy theme

2009-02-25 Thread Moreau , Jean-Sébastien
Hi, I can't see where you took that attribute from? It doesn't appear on the page I have used to map the tags : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline Do you know where the rendering rules are defined? Thanks Jean-Sebastien Moreau Ressources naturelles Canad

Re: [Talk-ca] Review of CanVec:Energy theme

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks, :-) Looks better now, Just reviewing it, i realize that i didn't add the tag "level=-1" or "level=1" so then the pipelines will get rendered right. Do you think this should be added? Cheers, Sam I have take a close look at the tags for the CanVec:Energy theme. I made a > few changes based

[Talk-ca] Review of CanVec:Energy theme

2009-02-25 Thread Moreau , Jean-Sébastien
Hi, I have take a close look at the tags for the CanVec:Energy theme. I made a few changes based on what I found in the Map features page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features Sam did a great first draft so it was easy to add on it. Great job! Jean-Sebastien Moreau Ressources natur

Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec2osm -264 tags needed to be confirmed

2009-02-25 Thread Moreau , Jean-Sébastien
Hi, I will take a look at CanVec:Energy theme tags tonight. Jean-Sebastien Moreau Ressources naturelles Canada / Natural Resources Canada Centre d'information topographique / Centre for Topographic Information Gouvernement du Canada / Government of Canada 2144-010 rue King Ouest, Sherbrooke

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Canvec2osm -264 tags needed to be confirmed

2009-02-25 Thread Jochen Topf
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:38:19AM -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote: > Thanks, Cool, i have switched the "CanVec:" to "canvec:" as that makes sense > :) > > and maybe, it makes sense, the CanVec the features are listed as 2 uppercase > letters. > However, I added it because i thought it would be more und

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Canvec2osm -264 tags needed to be confirmed

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks, Cool, i have switched the "CanVec:" to "canvec:" as that makes sense :) and maybe, it makes sense, the CanVec the features are listed as 2 uppercase letters. However, I added it because i thought it would be more understood by the users, to quickly be able to go to the wiki chart, as know

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Canvec2osm -264 tags needed to be confirmed

2009-02-25 Thread Jochen Topf
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 05:31:03PM -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote: > i'm working from the 11 wiki charts, and have most of it done, but i > feel i need at least 1 person to varify that they approve each of the > sugested tag(s). > > I will make an extra column in each chart for this. (i think it will

Re: [Talk-ca] [OSM-talk] Canvec2osm -264 tags needed to be confirmed

2009-02-25 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, thanks. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec_OSM_Map_Features#11_Distribution_themes_of_CanVec These are the 11 map feature charts. For some of the features that might be proposed, as always, there will be a link on the tags to the proposal pages. I don't think there is a need to have a