Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

After talking to them I'm not clear they understand enough about what they want and have a clear understanding of how to get it. The information you supplied will add to their knowledge and that may help shape their expectations. I think they have some expectations but I'm sure it will unfold

Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

On 6/15/2016 3:08 PM, john whelan wrote: Thank you Paul I think that sums up the issue nicely, someone at Stats Canada is going to have fun working out which tags are relevant to them especially when some may be a different way to express the same thing. Plus of course we have

Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

Thank you Paul I think that sums up the issue nicely, someone at Stats Canada is going to have fun working out which tags are relevant to them especially when some may be a different way to express the same thing. Plus of course we have amenity=library etc which might not be tagged as a building

Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

On 6/15/2016 8:01 AM, john whelan wrote: As a first step Stats would like to know the tags used when mapping buildings in Canada and the number of times used. This is to get an idea of what is already mapped and to see which values should be used when new tags are added. I looked at a

Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

On 2016-06-15 11:01 AM, john whelan wrote: > As a first step Stats would like to know the tags used when mapping > buildings in Canada and the number of times used. … I looked at a small > sample from Ottawa and > noted 127 different tags on buildings including address tags. This might be

Re: [Talk-ca] Stat Can and buildings

I'm aware it can be done but not having used overpass turbo I wasn't sure exactly how. I concur it's probably best dug out by a programmer. Cheerio John On 15 June 2016 at 12:54, Adam Martin wrote: > Hey John, > > Best initial source of information on the tags being