Re: [Talk-GB] Hants CC - Open Government Licence & use of data

2013-12-05 Thread Andy Street
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:53:15 + Nick Whitelegg wrote: > Pragmatically though is it really going to do any harm? Particularly > if we are just adding a designation tag rather than using the HCC > data to identify the course of a path? If you only interested in path designation (and possibly ref

Re: [Talk-GB] Hants CC - Open Government Licence & use of data

2013-12-05 Thread Nick Whitelegg
Pragmatically though is it really going to do any harm? Particularly if we are just adding a designation tag rather than using the HCC data to identify the course of a path? The path could just be tagged with "designation=public_footpath; source=HCC Open Data, (c) OS, OS OpenData Licence" and

Re: [Talk-GB] Hants CC - Open Government Licence & use of data

2013-12-05 Thread Jonathan Bennett
On 03/12/2013 21:36, Robert Norris wrote: Normally I visually compare Hants KML (and indeed West Sussex) vs OSM tile images to identify missing ROWs and then make that a basis to include in a route for a days out walking or cycling. This might help: http://bl.ocks.org/Jonobennett/raw/7152386

Re: [Talk-GB] Hants CC - Open Government Licence & use of data

2013-12-05 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 4 December 2013 11:45, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > Re the HCC data I have had this communication from Dan at HCC. > > "Hi Nick, > > I have been in comms with my contact at OS and the feedback I have had is > that ODBL and OS Open Licence can work together. As long as there is still > attribution