On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:18:45PM +0100, Dave F. wrote:
> In principle I understand what your saying & agree to some extent;
> except that I think it's incorrect to assume that on ground
> surveying is necessarily more accurate. GPS tracks are prone to
> being sent off course by the surroundings s
On 19/07/2010 11:40, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote:
This was me, but I know that Paul Sladen, Simon Halsey, and probably
others, were also affected.
Has anyone has sent the offending user a message?
He/she is a relative newcomer, and has edited in Trowbridge as well as
Carlton/Gedling.
I've been
This was me, but I know that Paul Sladen, Simon Halsey, and probably others,
were also affected.
Has anyone has sent the offending user a message?
He/she is a relative newcomer, and has edited in Trowbridge as well as
Carlton/Gedling. They have also edited in Germany, but no indication of trac
I just added a comment to the talk page about OS Opendata[1]: It seems
that some people have been using OS Opendata to “correct” existing data,
moving ways to match OS Opendata, and in some cases removing attributes
(such as surface=paved).
Please, please, please, pretty please don’t just assume
4 matches
Mail list logo